Literature DB >> 27780297

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new highly concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for conscious sedation.

Lenneke Schrier1, Rob Zuiker1, Frans W H M Merkus2, Erica S Klaassen1, Zheng Guan1, Bert Tuk3, Joop M A van Gerven1, Ronald van der Geest4, Geert Jan Groeneveld1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, nasal tolerance and effects on sedation of a highly concentrated aqueous intranasal midazolam formulation (Nazolam) and to compare these to intravenous midazolam.
METHODS: In this four-way crossover, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 16 subjects received 2.5 mg Nazolam, 5.0 mg Nazolam, 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam or placebo on different occasions. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and α-hydroxy-midazolam were characterized and related to outcome variables for sedation (saccadic peak velocity, the Bond and Lader visual analogue scale for sedation, the simple reaction time task and the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation). Nasal tolerance was evaluated through subject reporting, and ear, nose and throat examination.
RESULTS: Nazolam bioavailability was 75%. Maximal plasma concentrations of 31 ng ml-1 (CV, 42.3%) were reached after 11 min (2.5 mg Nazolam), and of 66 ng ml-1 (coefficient of variability, 31.5%) after 14 min (5.0 mg Nazolam). Nazolam displayed a significant effect on OAA/S scores. Sedation onset (based on SPV change) occurred 1 ± 0.7 min after administration of 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 7 ± 4.4 min after 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 4 ± 1.8 min after 5 mg Nazolam. Sedation duration was 118 ± 95.6 min for 2.5 mg intravenous midazolam, 76 ± 80.4 min for 2.5 mg Nazolam, and 145 ± 104.9 min for 5.0 mg Nazolam. Nazolam did not lead to nasal mucosa damage.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the nasal tolerance, safety and efficacy of Nazolam. When considering the preparation time needed for obtaining venous access, conscious sedation can be achieved in the same time span as needed for intravenous midazolam. Nazolam may offer important advantages in conscious sedation.
© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conscious sedation; intranasal; midazolam; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27780297      PMCID: PMC5346864          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  60 in total

1.  Nasal/buccal midazolam use in the community.

Authors:  M T Wilson; S Macleod; M E O'Regan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Quantitative measurement of saccade amplitude, duration, and velocity.

Authors:  R W Baloh; A W Sills; W E Kumley; V Honrubia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam after intranasal administration.

Authors:  A H Burstein; R Modica; M Hatton; A Forrest; F M Gengo
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Midazolam premedication delays recovery after propofol without modifying involuntary movements.

Authors:  J C Bevan; G R Veall; A J Macnab; C R Ries; C Marsland
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

Authors:  J Dingemanse; J M van Gerven; R C Schoemaker; G Roncari; J J Oberyé; M F van Oostenbruggen; J Massarella; P Segala; M Zell; A F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The role of sedation tests in identifying sedative drug effects in healthy volunteers and their power to dissociate sedative-related impairments from memory dysfunctions.

Authors:  E Wezenberg; B G C Sabbe; W Hulstijn; G S F Ruigt; R J Verkes
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.153

7.  Low-dose intranasal versus oral midazolam for routine body MRI of claustrophobic patients.

Authors:  Frank T C Tschirch; Kerstin Göpfert; Johannes M Fröhlich; Genevieve Brunner; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Bispectral analysis during deep sedation of pediatric oral surgery patients.

Authors:  Frank L Overly; Robert O Wright; Francis A Connor; Gregory D Jay; James G Linakis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of USL261, a midazolam formulation optimized for intranasal delivery, in a randomized study with healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Lindy L Bancke; Heather A Dworak; Keith A Rodvold; Mark B Halvorsen; Barry E Gidal
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Effect on hospital-wide sedation practices after implementation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines.

Authors:  Raymond Pitetti; Peter J Davis; Robert Redlinger; Jean White; Eugene Wiener; Karen H Calhoun
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2006-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation.

Authors:  Joji Sado-Filho; Karolline Alves Viana; Patrícia Corrêa-Faria; Luciane Rezende Costa; Paulo Sucasas Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  First-line management of canine status epilepticus at home and in hospital-opportunities and limitations of the various administration routes of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  Marios Charalambous; Holger A Volk; Luc Van Ham; Sofie F M Bhatti
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Perioperative Low Dose Dexmedetomidine and Its Effect on the Visibility of the Surgical Field for Middle Ear Microsurgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jinhong Wu; Yuan Han; Yu Lu; Yan Zhuang; Wenxian Li; Ji'e Jia
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.