Literature DB >> 11596837

Quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Quality-of-life Study Group of the Master 2 Project in Pharmacoeconomics.

S Trippoli1, M Vaiani, C Lucioni, A Messori.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have determined quality of life in patients with lung cancer, there is still little information about the use of generic questionnaires [e.g. the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36)] and utility questionnaires [e.g. the EuroQOL instrument (EQ-5D)] in this disease.
OBJECTIVES: To (i) measure quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the SF-36 and the EuroQOL questionnaires; (ii) to evaluate the impact of some clinical variables on quality of life and utility; (iii) to assess the correlation between the measurements produced by the 2 questionnaires. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 95 patients from 15 Italian hospitals with NSCLC (93% male, mean age 62 years) completed both questionnaires.
RESULTS: The mean scores for the 8 domains of the SF-36 ranged from 20.8 (physical role) to 63.0 (social functioning). The mean physical and mental summed scores of the SF-36 were 36.8 [standard deviation (SD) 9.8] and 43.0 (SD 11.5), respectively. The EuroQOL mean score was 0.58 (SD 0.32) in the self-classifier (SC) version and 0.58 (SD 0.20) in the visual analogue scale (VAS) version. Among the clinical variables that affected quality of life and utility, the presence of metastasis had the greatest impact: patients with metastasis had statistically significantly lower scores for 2 domains of the SF-36 (physical functioning, p = 0.009; bodily pain, p = 0.016), for the physical component summed score of the SF-36 (p = 0.015) and for both utility estimates (EuroQOL-SC, p = 0.027; EuroQOL-VAS, p = 0.038) than patients without metastasis. Both the SC and VAS EuroQOL scores showed a statistically significant correlation with each of the 8 domains of the SF-36. The scores for both the SF-36 and the EuroQOL in patients with NSCLC were considerably worse (relative differences ranging from -8 to -73%) than the corresponding values (normative data) previously reported for healthy individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study quantified the degree to which quality of life is impaired in patients with NSCLC, showed that the presence of metastasis had an important role, and indicated a strong correlation between the measurements produced by the 2 questionnaires. The EuroQOL measurements obtained from these patients will aid evaluation of the cost-utility ratio for NSCLC therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11596837     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119080-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  21 in total

Review 1.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Comparison of Euroqol EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Authors:  C Myers; D Wilks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The effects of pain severity on health-related quality of life: a study of Chinese cancer patients.

Authors:  X S Wang; C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; M C Engstrom; S Liu; G Xu; X Hao; Y Wang; X S Ren
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Health-related quality of life after elective surgery: measurement of longitudinal changes.

Authors:  C M Mangione; L Goldman; E J Orav; E R Marcantonio; A Pedan; L E Ludwig; M C Donaldson; D J Sugarbaker; R Poss; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a review of literature from 1970 to 1995.

Authors:  A Montazeri; C R Gillis; J McEwen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Health-related quality of life in asymptomatic patients with HIV. Evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Italian patients.

Authors:  F Arpinelli; G Visonà; R Bruno; G De Carli; G Apolone
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument.

Authors:  D F Cella; A E Bonomi; S R Lloyd; D S Tulsky; E Kaplan; P Bonomi
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 9.  Comparison of instruments for measuring quality of life in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  P J Hollen; R J Gralla
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer--a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  H Anderson; P Hopwood; R J Stephens; N Thatcher; B Cottier; M Nicholson; R Milroy; T S Maughan; S J Falk; M G Bond; P A Burt; C K Connolly; M B McIllmurray; J Carmichael
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  27 in total

1.  Eliciting social preference weights for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung health states.

Authors:  Paul Kind; Susan Macran
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Smoking cessation treatment and outcomes patterns simulation: a new framework for evaluating the potential health and economic impact of smoking cessation interventions.

Authors:  Denis Getsios; Jenő P Marton; Nikhil Revankar; Alexandra J Ward; Richard J Willke; Dale Rublee; K Jack Ishak; James G Xenakis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Health-related quality of life in lung cancer survivors: Latent class and latent transition analysis.

Authors:  Kelly M Kenzik; Michelle Y Martin; Mona N Fouad; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cost-effectiveness of using a gene expression profiling test to aid in identifying the primary tumour in patients with cancer of unknown primary.

Authors:  M B Hannouf; E Winquist; S M Mahmud; M Brackstone; S Sarma; G Rodrigues; P Rogan; J S Hoch; G S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Effects of enzyme replacement therapy on pain and health related quality of life in patients with Fabry disease: data from FOS (Fabry Outcome Survey).

Authors:  B Hoffmann; A Garcia de Lorenzo; A Mehta; M Beck; U Widmer; R Ricci
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Erlotinib: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David D Stenehjem; Brandon K Bellows; Kraig M Yager; Joshua Jones; Rajesh Kaldate; Uwe Siebert; Diana I Brixner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-11-27

8.  Validation of EQ-5D in patients with cervical cancer in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hui-Chu Lang; Linghsiang Chuang; Shiow-Ching Shun; Ching-Lin Hsieh; Chung-Fu Lan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Cost effectiveness of varenicline in Belgium, compared with bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy, brief counselling and unaided smoking cessation: a BENESCO Markov cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Lieven Annemans; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Pierre Bartsch; Jacques Prignot; Sophie Marbaix
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Caitlyn T Wilke; Hsiang-Wen Lin; Andrew Lloyd
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.