Literature DB >> 9383049

A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

S L Holbeck1, J N Strathern.   

Abstract

Recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), traditionally believed to be an error-free DNA repair pathway, was recently shown to increase the frequency of mutations in a nearby interval. The reversion rate of trp1 alleles (either nonsense or frameshift mutations) near an HO-endonuclease cleavage site is increased at least 100-fold among cells that have experienced an HO-mediated DSB. We report here that in strains deleted for rev3 this DSB-associated reversion of a nonsense mutation was greatly decreased. Thus REV3, which encodes a subunit of the translesion DNA polymerase zeta, was responsible for the majority of these base substitution errors near a DSB. However, rev3 strains showed no decrease in HO-stimulated recombination, implying that another DNA polymerase also functioned in recombinational repair of a DSB. Reversion of trp1 frameshift alleles near a DSB was not reduced in rev3 strains, indicating that another polymerase could act during DSB repair to make these frameshift errors. Analysis of spontaneous reversion in haploid strains suggested that Rev3p had a greater role in making point mutations than in frameshift mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383049      PMCID: PMC1208230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  29 in total

1.  Isolation of the gene encoding yeast DNA polymerase I.

Authors:  L M Johnson; M Snyder; L M Chang; R W Davis; J L Campbell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.

Authors:  E Alani; L Cao; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.

Authors:  J W Szostak; T L Orr-Weaver; R J Rothstein; F W Stahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast.

Authors:  R E Jensen; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1984

5.  Mutator versus antimutator activity of a T4 DNA polymerase mutant distinguishes two different frameshifting mechanisms.

Authors:  L S Ripley; B W Glickman; N B Shoemaker
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1983

6.  REV3, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene whose function is required for induced mutagenesis, is predicted to encode a nonessential DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Morrison; R B Christensen; J Alley; A K Beck; E G Bernstine; J F Lemontt; C W Lawrence
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  UV-induced reversion of his4 frameshift mutations in rad6, rev1, and rev3 mutants of yeast.

Authors:  C W Lawrence; T O'Brien; J Bond
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

Review 8.  Deoxyribonucleic acid repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E C Friedberg
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-03

9.  The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis.

Authors:  F W Larimer; J R Perry; A A Hardigree
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance.

Authors:  J D Boeke; F LaCroute; G R Fink
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984
View more
  99 in total

1.  Evidence that stationary-phase hypermutation in the Escherichia coli chromosome is promoted by recombination.

Authors:  H J Bull; G J McKenzie; P J Hastings; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Evolution and the molecular basis of somatic hypermutation of antigen receptor genes.

Authors:  M Diaz; M F Flajnik; N Klinman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Adaptive mutation: implications for evolution.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Stationary-phase mutation in the bacterial chromosome: recombination protein and DNA polymerase IV dependence.

Authors:  H J Bull; M J Lombardo; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Somatic immunoglobulin hypermutation.

Authors:  Marilyn Diaz; Paolo Casali
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 6.  The connection between transcription and genomic instability.

Authors:  Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Somatic hypermutation in human B cell subsets.

Authors:  N S Longo; P E Lipsky
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001-12

8.  The translesion DNA polymerase zeta plays a major role in Ig and bcl-6 somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  H Zan; A Komori; Z Li; A Cerutti; A Schaffer; M F Flajnik; M Diaz; P Casali
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  Meiosis and the evolution of recombination at low mutation rates.

Authors:  D D Gessler; S Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Stress-Induced Mutagenesis: Implications in Cancer and Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Devon M Fitzgerald; P J Hastings; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.