Literature DB >> 9373979

Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.

C Zhang1, F G Zeng.   

Abstract

Traditional loudness models have been based on the average energy and the critical band analysis of steady-state sounds. However, most environmental sounds, including speech, are dynamic stimuli, in which the average level [e.g., the root-mean-square (rms) level] does not account for the large temporal fluctuations. The question addressed here was whether two stimuli of the same rms level but different peak levels would produce an equal loudness sensation. A modern adaptive procedure was used to replicate two classic experiments demonstrating that the sensation of "beats" in a two- or three-tone complex resulted in a louder sensation [E. Zwicker and H. Fastl, Psychoacoustics-Facts and Models (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990)]. Two additional experiments were conducted to study exclusively the effects of the temporal envelope on the loudness sensation of dynamic stimuli. Loudness balance was performed by normal-hearing listeners between a white noise and a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noise in one experiment, and by cochlear implant listeners between two harmonic stimuli of the same magnitude spectra, but different phase spectra, in the other experiment. The results from both experiments showed that, for two stimuli of the same rms level, the stimulus with greater temporal fluctuations sometimes produced a significantly louder sensation, depending on the temporal frequency and overall stimulus level. In normal-hearing listeners, the louder sensation was produced for the amplitude-modulated stimuli with modulation frequencies lower than 400 Hz, and gradually disappeared above 400 Hz, resulting in a low-pass filtering characteristic which bore some similarity to the temporal modulation transfer function. The extent to which loudness was greater was a nonmonotonic function of level in acoustic hearing and a monotonically increasingly function in electric hearing. These results suggest that the loudness sensation of a dynamic stimulus is not limited to a 100-ms temporal integration process, and may be determined jointly by a compression process in the cochlea and an expansion process in the brain. A level-dependent compression scheme that may better restore normal loudness of dynamic stimuli in hearing aids and cochlear implants is proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373979     DOI: 10.1121/1.420347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Amplitude modulation and loudness in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Katherine R Henshall
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

3.  Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral loudness summation takes place in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Markus Röhl; Birger Kollmeier; Stefan Uppenkamp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Development and the role of internal noise in detection and discrimination thresholds with narrow band stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Neural coding of sound intensity and loudness in the human auditory system.

Authors:  Markus Röhl; Stefan Uppenkamp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-22

10.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.