Literature DB >> 9373954

Bat-deafness in day-flying moths (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae, Dioptinae).

J H Fullard1, J W Dawson, L D Otero, A Surlykke.   

Abstract

Assuming that bat-detection is the primary function of moth ears, the ears of moths that are no longer exposed to bats should be deaf to echolocation call frequencies. To test this, we compared the auditory threshold curves of 7 species of Venezuelan day-flying moths (Notodontidae: Dioptinae) to those of 12 sympatric species of nocturnal moths (Notodontidae: Dudusinae, Noctuidae and Arctiidae). Whereas 2 dioptines (Josia turgida, Zunacetha annulata) revealed normal ears, 2 (J. radians, J. gopala) had reduced hearing at bat-specific frequencies (20-80 kHz) and the remaining 3 (Thirmida discinota, Polypoetes circumfumata and Xenorma cytheris) revealed pronounced to complete levels of high-frequency deafness. Although the bat-deaf ears of dioptines could function in other purposes (e.g., social communication), the poor sensitivities of these species even at their best frequencies suggest that these moths represent a state of advanced auditory degeneration brought about by their diurnal life history. The phylogeny of the Notodontidae further suggests that this deafness is a derived (apomorphic) condition and not a retention of a primitive (pleisiomorphic), insensitive state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373954     DOI: 10.1007/s003590050131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  11 in total

1.  Day-flying butterflies remain day-flying in a Polynesian, bat-free habitat.

Authors:  J H Fullard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  If a bird flies in the forest, does an insect hear it?

Authors:  J P Fournier; J W Dawson; A Mikhail; J E Yack
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Release from bats: genetic distance and sensoribehavioural regression in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  James H Fullard; Hannah M ter Hofstede; John M Ratcliffe; Gerald S Pollack; Gian S Brigidi; Robin M Tinghitella; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-24

4.  Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Frank Macías-Escrivá; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Moth hearing and sound communication.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Specializations for aerial hawking in the echolocation system of Molossus molossus (Molossidae, Chiroptera).

Authors:  E C Mora; S Macías; M Vater; F Coro; M Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Elisabeth K V Kalko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hearing in the crepuscular owl butterfly (Caligo eurilochus, Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Kathleen M Lucas; Jennifer K Mongrain; James F C Windmill; Daniel Robert; Jayne E Yack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.