Literature DB >> 9370559

How much contrast is enough?. Dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequence.

A D Elster1.   

Abstract

The overwhelming majority of published studies defining the clinical utility of gadolinium administration for neuroimaging have been performed at high field using conventional spin-echo imaging. Concerning the issue of field strength, several investigations have now shown that for a given dose of contrast, enhancement is less apparent at low field than at high field. Concerning the issue of pulse sequence, there is now convincing clinical and experimental evidence that all T1-weighted sequences are not equal in demonstrating contrast enhancement. Specifically, T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequences do not show the same degree of visually apparent contrast enhancement compared to conventional spin-echo sequences. The use of magnetization transfer techniques which demonstrate areas of enhancement unseen on conventional pulse sequences is also addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9370559     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  8 in total

1.  Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and robust fat suppression.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Consensus recommendations for a standardized brain tumor imaging protocol for clinical trials in brain metastases.

Authors:  Timothy J Kaufmann; Marion Smits; Jerrold Boxerman; Raymond Huang; Daniel P Barboriak; Michael Weller; Caroline Chung; Christina Tsien; Paul D Brown; Lalitha Shankar; Evanthia Galanis; Elizabeth Gerstner; Martin J van den Bent; Terry C Burns; Ian F Parney; Gavin Dunn; Priscilla K Brastianos; Nancy U Lin; Patrick Y Wen; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Accuracy of 3 T versus 1.5 T breast MRI for pre-operative assessment of extent of disease in newly diagnosed DCIS.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Wendy B DeMartini; Amie Y Lee; Savannah C Partridge; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Breast MRI at 7 Tesla with a bilateral coil and T1-weighted acquisition with robust fat suppression: image evaluation and comparison with 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Ryan Brown; Pippa Storey; Christian Geppert; KellyAnne McGorty; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; James Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins; Linda Moy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Intraindividual comparison of MRI-derived liver surface nodularity score at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Weon Jang; Ji Soo Song; Tae-Hoon Kim; Kwon-Ha Yoon
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-01-21

7.  High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Gero Wieners; Jacqueline Detert; Florian Streitparth; Maciej Pech; Frank Fischbach; Gerd Burmester; Jens Ricke; Marina Backhaus; Harald Bruhn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Josh Socolow; Salil Patel; Roderic I Pettigrew; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.