Literature DB >> 17219147

High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Gero Wieners1, Jacqueline Detert, Florian Streitparth, Maciej Pech, Frank Fischbach, Gerd Burmester, Jens Ricke, Marina Backhaus, Harald Bruhn.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare magnetic resonance (MR) image quality at different field strengths for evaluating lesions in wrist and finger joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in order to determine whether the higher field strength provides diagnostic gain. The hand mainly affected in 17 RA patients was examined at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T with comparable MR imaging (MRI) protocols. MR images were reviewed twice by two experienced radiologists using the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (RAMRIS) of the OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials) group. Image quality was rated on a five-point scale using Friedmann's test and Kendall's W-test for statistical analysis. Image comparison revealed better image quality at higher field strength. Image quality of T1-weighted images was rated 14-22% better at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T by both readers. Moreover, the rating for the T2-weighted-images acquired at 3.0 T was one point better in the five-point scale used. Inter-reader correlation for image quality, bone erosions/defects, edema and synovitis ranged between 0.6 and 0.9 at 3.0 T and between 0.6 and 0.8 at 1.5 T. Intra-reader correlation for these parameters was high at 0.8-1.0. MRI image quality of RA hands is superior at 3.0 T, while an acceptable image quality is achieved at 1.5 T, which improves the evaluation of extent of bone edema, synovitis and identification of small bone erosions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219147     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0539-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  21 in total

1.  The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI.

Authors:  R T Constable; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Eric Han; Jeff Stainsby; Graham Wright; Jean Brittain; Christopher Beaulieu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Rainald Bachmann; Ralf Reilmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Stefan Krämer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group.

Authors:  Andrea Klauser; Johannes Demharter; Armanda De Marchi; Delia Sureda; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Carlo Faletti; Michael Schirmer; Timm Kleffel; Klaus Bohndorf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Value of various MR sequences using 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in analyzing cartilaginous defects of the patella in an animal model].

Authors:  R J Schröder; F Fischbach; F N Unterhauser; A Weiler; R Felix; H Bruhn
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-11

6.  MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions.

Authors:  Anette Savnik; Hanne Malmskov; Henrik S Thomsen; Lykke B Graff; Henrik Nielsen; Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe; Jens Boesen; Henning Bliddal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging of the forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis when findings on imaging of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands remain normal.

Authors:  Benedikt Ostendorf; Axel Scherer; Ulrich Mödder; Matthias Schneider
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-07

Review 8.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Core set of MRI acquisitions, joint pathology definitions, and the OMERACT RA-MRI scoring system.

Authors:  Mikkel Østergaard; Charles Peterfy; Philip Conaghan; Fiona McQueen; Paul Bird; Bo Ejbjerg; Ron Shnier; Philip O'Connor; Mette Klarlund; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; Marissa Lassere; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI Score.

Authors:  Marissa Lassere; Fiona McQueen; Mikkel Østergaard; Philip Conaghan; Ron Shnier; Charles Peterfy; Mette Klarlund; Paul Bird; Philip O'Connor; Neal Stewart; Paul Emery; Harry Genant; John Edmonds
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 10.  Role of biologics in early arthritis.

Authors:  P Emery; Y Seto
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Arthroscopic synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis of wrist.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Kwang-Am Jung
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2007-12-17

2.  Comparing proton density and turbo spin echo T2 weighted static sequences with dynamic half-Fourier single-shot TSE pulse sequence at 3.0 T in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Cassetta; F Barchetti; N Pranno; M Marini
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Standardized quantitative measurements of wrist cartilage in healthy humans using 3T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jean-Vincent Zink; Philippe Souteyrand; Sandrine Guis; Christophe Chagnaud; Yann Le Fur; Daniela Militianu; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Michael Rozenbaum; Itzhak Rosner; Maxime Guye; Monique Bernard; David Bendahan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

4.  Muscle-fat MRI: 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla versus histology.

Authors:  Andrew C Smith; Todd B Parrish; Rebecca Abbott; Mark A Hoggarth; Karl Mendoza; Yu Fen Chen; James M Elliott
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Radiographic estimation in seropositive and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Vjollca Sahatçiu-Meka; Sylejman Rexhepi; Suzana Manxhuka-Kërliu; Mjellma Rexhepi
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 6.  Examining the validity of the rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score according to the OMERACT filter-a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Thasia G Woodworth; Olga Morgacheva; Olga L Pimienta; Orrin M Troum; Veena K Ranganath; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Patterns of magnetic resonance imaging of the foot in rheumatoid arthritis: which joints are most frequently involved?

Authors:  Christian Buchbender; Axel Scherer; Falk Miese; Philipp Sewerin; Alexandra Haferkamp; Ralph Brinks; Hans-Joerg Wittsack; Gerald Antoch; Matthias Schneider; Benedikt Ostendorf
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome--image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Wolfgang Drahanowsky; Margit Bristela; Michael Kundi; Eva Piehslinger; Soraya Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  High-resolution uniform MR imaging of finger joints using a dedicated RF coil at 3T.

Authors:  Wingchi E Kwok; Zhigang You; Johnny Monu; Gwysuk Seo; Christopher Ritchlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Comparison of 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners in evaluation of acute bone stress in the foot.

Authors:  Markus J Sormaala; Juha-Petri Ruohola; Ville M Mattila; Seppo K Koskinen; Harri K Pihlajamäki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.