Literature DB >> 11847287

Improved detection of homologous membrane proteins by inclusion of information from topology predictions.

Maria Hedman1, Hans Deloof, Gunnar Von Heijne, Arne Elofsson.   

Abstract

A total of 20%-25% of the proteins in a typical genome are helical membrane proteins. The transmembrane regions of these proteins have markedly different properties when compared with globular proteins. This presents a problem when homology search algorithms optimized for globular proteins are applied to membrane proteins. Here we present modifications of the standard Smith-Waterman and profile search algorithms that significantly improve the detection of related membrane proteins. The improvement is based on the inclusion of information about predicted transmembrane segments in the alignment algorithm. This is done by simply increasing the alignment score if two residues predicted to belong to transmembrane segments are aligned with each other. Benchmarking over a test set of G-protein-coupled receptor sequences shows that the number of false positives is significantly reduced in this way, both when closely related and distantly related proteins are searched for.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11847287      PMCID: PMC2373465          DOI: 10.1110/ps.39402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  28 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Collecting and harvesting biological data: the GPCRDB and NucleaRDB information systems.

Authors:  F Horn; G Vriend; F E Cohen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  N J Tourasse; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Identification of related proteins on family, superfamily and fold level.

Authors:  E Lindahl; A Elofsson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Non-symmetric score matrices and the detection of homologous transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  T Müller; S Rahmann; M Rehmsmeier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Helical membrane protein folding, stability, and evolution.

Authors:  J L Popot; D M Engelman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods.

Authors:  J Park; K Karplus; C Barrett; R Hughey; D Haussler; T Hubbard; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-12-11       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading.

Authors:  B Rost; R Schneider; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

Authors:  C A Orengo; A D Michie; S Jones; D T Jones; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  11 in total

1.  Best alpha-helical transmembrane protein topology predictions are achieved using hidden Markov models and evolutionary information.

Authors:  Håkan Viklund; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Internal duplications in α-helical membrane protein topologies are common but the nonduplicated forms are rare.

Authors:  Aron Hennerdal; Jenny Falk; Erik Lindahl; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins.

Authors:  Lucy R Forrest; Christopher L Tang; Barry Honig
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Membrane protein prediction methods.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Lucy R Forrest; Henry Bigelow; Andrew Kernytsky; Jinfeng Liu; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  Functional and evolutionary implications of enhanced genomic analysis of rhomboid intramembrane proteases.

Authors:  Marius K Lemberg; Matthew Freeman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  More than 1,001 problems with protein domain databases: transmembrane regions, signal peptides and the issue of sequence homology.

Authors:  Wing-Cheong Wong; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Frank Eisenhaber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Protein family comparison using statistical models and predicted structural information.

Authors:  Richard Chung; Golan Yona
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Computational and experimental approaches to chart the Escherichia coli cell-envelope-associated proteome and interactome.

Authors:  Juan Javier Díaz-Mejía; Mohan Babu; Andrew Emili
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines.

Authors:  Timothy Nugent; David T Jones
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Transmembrane protein alignment and fold recognition based on predicted topology.

Authors:  Han Wang; Zhiquan He; Chao Zhang; Li Zhang; Dong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.