Literature DB >> 10954732

Statistical significance of protein structure prediction by threading.

L A Mirny1, A V Finkelstein, E I Shakhnovich.   

Abstract

In this study, we estimate the statistical significance of structure prediction by threading. We introduce a single parameter epsilon that serves as a universal measure determining the probability that the best alignment is indeed a native-like analog. Parameter epsilon takes into account both length and composition of the query sequence and the number of decoys in threading simulation. It can be computed directly from the query sequence and potential of interactions, eliminating the need for sequence reshuffling and realignment. Although our theoretical analysis is general, here we compare its predictions with the results of gapless threading. Finally we estimate the number of decoys from which the native structure can be found by existing potentials of interactions. We discuss how this analysis can be extended to determine the optimal gap penalties for any sequence-structure alignment (threading) method, thus optimizing it to maximum possible performance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954732      PMCID: PMC27644          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.160271197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  An anytime local-to-global optimization algorithm for protein threading in theta (m2ñ2) space.

Authors:  R H Lathrop
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1999 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition.

Authors:  A R Panchenko; A Marchler-Bauer; S H Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Averaging interaction energies over homologs improves protein fold recognition in gapless threading.

Authors:  B A Reva; J Skolnick; A V Finkelstein
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-15

4.  Optimizing energy potentials for success in protein tertiary structure prediction.

Authors:  T L Chiu; R A Goldstein
Journal:  Fold Des       Date:  1998

5.  Phase diagram of random copolymers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics       Date:  1993-07

6.  Statistical mechanics of simple models of protein folding and design.

Authors:  V S Pande; A Y Grosberg; T Tanaka
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison.

Authors:  M Levitt; M Gerstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Formation of unique structure in polypeptide chains. Theoretical investigation with the aid of a replica approach.

Authors:  E I Shakhnovich; A M Gutin
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Impact of local and non-local interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding.

Authors:  V I Abkevich; A M Gutin; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding.

Authors:  J D Bryngelson; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  A novel method for finding tRNA genes.

Authors:  Vickie Tsui; Tom Macke; David A Case
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Statistical significance of threading scores.

Authors:  Afshin Fayyaz Movaghar; Guillaume Launay; Sophie Schbath; Jean-François Gibrat; François Rodolphe
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  A multi-objective evolutionary approach to the protein structure prediction problem.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cutello; Giuseppe Narzisi; Giuseppe Nicosia
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  TASSER_low-zsc: an approach to improve structure prediction using low z-score-ranked templates.

Authors:  Shashi B Pandit; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-10

5.  An estimate of the numbers and density of low-energy structures (or decoys) in the conformational landscape of proteins.

Authors:  Kanagasabai Vadivel; Gautham Namasivayam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.