Literature DB >> 9358788

Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates.

F Burbank1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare specimen weights, tissue acquisition times, and complication rates for 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probes during stereotactic breast biopsy. Three hundred forty stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsies were reviewed for complications; 269 (79%) of these biopsies were performed with the 14-gauge Mammotome probe, and 71 (21%) with the 11-gauge probe. Aggregate specimen weights and tissue acquisition times were measured in 248 out of 340 stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsies. Of these 248 lesions, 186 (75%) were performed with the 14-gauge probe, and 62 (25%) with the 11-gauge probe. Complication rates were essentially the same for each probe: 1.1 per cent for the 14-gauge probe and 1.4 per cent for the 11-gauge probe (not significant). More total aggregate breast tissue was obtained during the biopsies performed with the 11-gauge Mammotome probes than with the 14-gauge probes (1730 versus 1067 mg; P < or = 0.0001). The number of specimens acquired was smaller during the 11-gauge biopsy sessions (18 versus 27; P < or = 0.0001). The average per-specimen weight was significantly higher with the 11-gauge probe: 96 versus 40 mg per specimen (P < or = 0.0001). The average tissue harvesting time was approximately the same with each probe size, 15.6 minutes for the 11-gauge probe and 15.4 for the 14-gauge probe (not significant). Consequently, the harvesting rate (mg of tissue obtained per minute) was 111 mg/minute with the 11-gauge probe versus 69 with the 14-gauge probe (P < or = 0.0001). The per-specimen breast tissue yield, using the 11-gauge probe, was more than two times greater than the yield using the 14-gauge probe. There was no increase in procedure time, and there were no additional complications.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9358788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Early Breast Cancer Precursor Lesions: Lessons Learned from Molecular and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Sinn; Zeinab Elsawaf; Birgit Helmchen; Sebastian Aulmann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Values of pathological analysis of lost tissue fragments in the vacuum canister during a vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  M El Khoury; B Mesurolle; A Omeroglu; A Aldis; E Kao
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Borderline breast lesions: comparison of malignancy underestimation rates with 14-gauge core needle biopsy versus 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device.

Authors:  Viviana Londero; Chiara Zuiani; Anna Linda; Luisa Battigelli; Giovanni Brondani; Massimo Bazzocchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Park; Lee Su Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  M Tonegutti; V Girardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Sang Hyup Lee; Youn Joo Jung; Hyuk Jae Jung; Jee Yeon Kim; Ki Seok Choo; Kyung Jin Nam; Hyun Yul Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities.

Authors:  G M Fuhrman; G J Cederbom; J S Bolton; T A King; J L Duncan; J L Champaign; D H Smetherman; G H Farr; R R Kuske; W M McKinnon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Stereotactic biopsy of the breast using a decubitus table: comparison of histologic underestimation rates between 11- and 8-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Kyoung Eun Lee; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Joo Hee Cha
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.