Literature DB >> 9353603

Symmetrization of the blood glucose measurement scale and its applications.

B P Kovatchev1, D J Cox, L A Gonder-Frederick, W Clarke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a data transformation that enhances the power of blood glucose data analyses. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the standard blood glucose scale, hypoglycemia (blood glucose, < 3.9 mmol/l) and hyperglycemia (blood glucose, > 10 mmol/l) have very different ranges, and euglycemia is not central in the entire blood glucose range (1.1-33.3 mmol/l). Consequently, the scale is not symmetric and its clinical center (blood glucose, 6-7 mmol/l) is distant from its numerical center (blood glucose, 17 mmol/l). As a result, when blood glucose readings are analyzed, the assumptions of many parametric statistics are routinely violated. We propose a logarithmic data transformation that matches the clinical and numerical center of the blood glucose scale, thus making the transformed data symmetric.
RESULTS: The transformation normalized 203 out of 205 data samples containing 13,584 blood glucose readings of 127 type 1 diabetic individuals. An example illustrates that the mean and standard deviation based on transformed, rather than on raw, data better described subject's blood glucose distribution. Based on transformed data: 1) the low blood glucose index predicted the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia, while the raw blood glucose data (and glycosylated hemoglobin levels) did not; 2) the high blood glucose index correlated with the subjects' glycosylated hemoglobin (r = 0.63, P < 0.001); and 3) the low plus high blood glucose index was more sensitive than the raw data to a treatment (blood glucose awareness training) designed to reduce the range of blood glucose fluctuations.
CONCLUSIONS: Using symmetrized, instead of raw, blood glucose data strengthens the existing data analysis procedures and allows for the development of new statistical techniques. It is proposed that raw blood glucose data should be routinely transformed to a symmetric distribution before using parametric statistics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353603     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  88 in total

1.  Hypoglycemia prevention via pump attenuation and red-yellow-green "traffic" lights using continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump data.

Authors:  Colleen S Hughes; Stephen D Patek; Marc D Breton; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes: improvement in accuracy by correcting for background current.

Authors:  Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Julia M Engle; Ryan G Massoud; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring: improved accuracy of point and trend estimates of the Multisensor system.

Authors:  Mattia Zanon; Giovanni Sparacino; Andrea Facchinetti; Michela Riz; Mark S Talary; Roland E Suri; Andreas Caduff; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Measures of Risk and Glucose Variability in Adults Versus Youths.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Are Risk Indices Derived From CGM Interchangeable With SMBG-Based Indices?

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Stephen D Patek; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 6.  Is glycemic variability important to assessing antidiabetes therapies?

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices.

Authors:  Enrico Longato; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Alberto Maran; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-31

8.  The interrelationships of glycemic control measures: HbA1c, glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitrol, and continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Roy Beck; Michael Steffes; Dongyuan Xing; Katrina Ruedy; Nelly Mauras; Darrell M Wilson; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.866

9.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Michelle Nguyen; Julia Han; Elias K Spanakis; Boris P Kovatchev; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Predicting and Preventing Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Using Big Data Analytics and Decision Theoretic Analysis.

Authors:  Clara Mosquera-Lopez; Robert Dodier; Nichole S Tyler; Leah M Wilson; Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Peter G Jacobs
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.