Literature DB >> 22722898

Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring: improved accuracy of point and trend estimates of the Multisensor system.

Mattia Zanon1, Giovanni Sparacino, Andrea Facchinetti, Michela Riz, Mark S Talary, Roland E Suri, Andreas Caduff, Claudio Cobelli.   

Abstract

Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring (NI-CGM) sensors are still at an early stage of development, but, in the near future, they could become particularly appealing in diabetes management. Solianis Monitoring AG (Zurich, Switzerland) has proposed an approach for NI-CGM based on a multi-sensor concept, embedding primarily dielectric spectroscopy and optical sensors. This concept requires a mathematical model able to estimate glucose levels from the 150 channels directly measured through the Multisensor. A static multivariate linear regression model (with order and parameters common to the entire population of subjects) was proposed for such a scope (Caduff et al., Biosens Bioelectron 26:3794-3800, 2011). The aim of this work is to evaluate the accuracy in the estimation of glucose levels and trends that the NI-CGM Multisensor platform can achieve by exploiting different techniques for model identification, namely, ordinary least squares, subset variable selection, partial least squares and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Data collected in human beings monitored for a total of 45 study days were used for model identification and model test. Several metrics of standard use in the diabetes scientific community to measure point and clinical accuracy of glucose sensors were used to assess the models. Results indicate that the LASSO technique is superior to the others shrinking many channel weights to zero thus leading to smoother glucose profiles and resulting in a more robust model to possible artifacts in the Multisensor data. Although, as expected, the performance of the NI-CGM system with the LASSO model is not yet comparable with that of enzyme-based needle glucose sensors, glucose trends are satisfactorily estimated. Considering the non-invasive nature of the multi-sensor platform, this result can have an immediate impact in the current clinical practice, e.g., to integrate sparse self-monitoring of blood glucose data with an indication of the glucose trend to aid the diabetic patient in dealing with, or even preventing in the short time scale, the threats of critical events such as hypoglycaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722898     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0932-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  28 in total

1.  Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring with optical coherence tomography: a pilot study in human subjects.

Authors:  Kirill V Larin; Mohsen S Eledrisi; Massoud Motamedi; Rinat O Esenaliev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Non-invasive glucose monitoring: assessment of technologies and devices according to quantitative criteria.

Authors:  Andrea Tura; Alberto Maran; Giovanni Pacini
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  The chemistry of commercial continuous glucose monitors.

Authors:  Geoffrey McGarraugh
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 4.  The future of continuous glucose monitoring: closed loop.

Authors:  Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Curr Diabetes Rev       Date:  2008-08

Review 5.  Cutaneous blood perfusion as a perturbing factor for noninvasive glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Andreas Caduff; Mark S Talary; Pavel Zakharov
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  The enzyme electrode.

Authors:  S J Updike; G P Hicks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A robust sliding mode controller with internal model for closed-loop artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Amjad Abu-Rmileh; Winston Garcia-Gabin; Darine Zambrano
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Control oriented model of insulin and glucose dynamics in type 1 diabetics.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Fabietti; Valentina Canonico; Marco Orsini Federici; Massimo Massi Benedetti; Eugenio Sarti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Artificial pancreas: past, present, future.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  10 in total

1.  Designing an artificial pancreas architecture: the AP@home experience.

Authors:  Giordano Lanzola; Chiara Toffanin; Federico Di Palma; Simone Del Favero; Lalo Magni; Riccardo Bellazzi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Single-walled carbon nanotube-based near-infrared optical glucose sensors toward in vivo continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Kyungsuk Yum; Thomas P McNicholas; Bin Mu; Michael S Strano
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

3.  First Experiences With a Wearable Multisensor Device in a Noninvasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study at Home, Part II: The Investigators' View.

Authors:  Mattia Zanon; Martin Mueller; Pavel Zakharov; Mark S Talary; Marc Donath; Werner A Stahel; Andreas Caduff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  The Effect of a Global, Subject, and Device-Specific Model on a Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring Multisensor System.

Authors:  Andreas Caduff; Mattia Zanon; Martin Mueller; Pavel Zakharov; Yuri Feldman; Oscar De Feo; Marc Donath; Werner A Stahel; Mark S Talary
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-24

5.  First Experiences With a Wearable Multisensor in an Outpatient Glucose Monitoring Study, Part I: The Users' View.

Authors:  Andreas Caduff; Mattia Zanon; Pavel Zakharov; Martin Mueller; Mark Talary; Achim Krebs; Werner A Stahel; Marc Donath
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-14

Review 6.  Future Perspectives in Glucose Monitoring Sensors.

Authors:  Giulio Frontino; Franco Meschi; Riccardo Bonfanti; Andrea Rigamonti; Roseila Battaglino; Valeria Favalli; Clara Bonura; Giusy Ferro; Giuseppe Chiumello
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-15

7.  Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring.

Authors:  Geoff Appelboom; Elvis Camacho; Mickey E Abraham; Samuel S Bruce; Emmanuel Lp Dumont; Brad E Zacharia; Randy D'Amico; Justin Slomian; Jean Yves Reginster; Olivier Bruyère; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2014-08-22

Review 8.  Italian contributions to the development of continuous glucose monitoring sensors for diabetes management.

Authors:  Giovanni Sparacino; Mattia Zanon; Andrea Facchinetti; Chiara Zecchin; Alberto Maran; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring with multi-sensor systems: a Monte Carlo-based methodology for assessing calibration robustness.

Authors:  Mattia Zanon; Giovanni Sparacino; Andrea Facchinetti; Mark S Talary; Martin Mueller; Andreas Caduff; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Sensor Monitoring of Physical Activity to Improve Glucose Management in Diabetic Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Sandrine Ding; Michael Schumacher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.