OBJECTIVES: To describe the interrelationships of glycemic control measures: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitrol (1,5-AG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In total, 26 subjects of age 4-17 had HbA1c measurement followed within 14 d by three laboratory measures of glycemia and the collection of CGM glucose data (N = 21). RESULTS: Glycated albumin and fructosamine levels had a higher correlation with each other than with HbA1c. The correlation of 1,5-AG with HbA1c was lower (absolute r value = 0.25). All four measures had a similar degree of correlation with CGM-measured mean glucose (absolute r value = 0.50-0.56) and with hyperglycemic area under the curve (AUC) at 180 mg/dL (0.50-0.60). CONCLUSION: Each of the four measures (i.e., HbA1c, glycated albumin, fructosamine, and 1,5-AG) had a similar correlation with mean glucose and hyperglycemic AUC-180. 1,5-AG did not correlate with hyperglycemic AUC-180 better than did HbA1c.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the interrelationships of glycemic control measures: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), glycated albumin, fructosamine, 1,5-anhydroglucitrol (1,5-AG), and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In total, 26 subjects of age 4-17 had HbA1c measurement followed within 14 d by three laboratory measures of glycemia and the collection of CGMglucose data (N = 21). RESULTS: Glycated albumin and fructosamine levels had a higher correlation with each other than with HbA1c. The correlation of 1,5-AG with HbA1c was lower (absolute r value = 0.25). All four measures had a similar degree of correlation with CGM-measured mean glucose (absolute r value = 0.50-0.56) and with hyperglycemic area under the curve (AUC) at 180 mg/dL (0.50-0.60). CONCLUSION: Each of the four measures (i.e., HbA1c, glycated albumin, fructosamine, and 1,5-AG) had a similar correlation with mean glucose and hyperglycemic AUC-180. 1,5-AG did not correlate with hyperglycemic AUC-180 better than did HbA1c.
Authors: Curt L Rohlfing; Hsiao-Mei Wiedmeyer; Randie R Little; Jack D England; Alethea Tennill; David E Goldstein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kathleen M Dungan; John B Buse; Joseph Largay; Mary M Kelly; Eric A Button; Shuhei Kato; Steven Wittlin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Eva Tsalikian; William Tamborlane; Dongyuan Xing; Dorothy M Becker; Nelly Mauras; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Bruce Buckingham; Stuart Weinzimer; Michael Steffes; Ravinder Singh; Roy Beck; Katrina Ruedy; Craig Kollman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Christine L Chan; Laura Pyle; Megan M Kelsey; Lindsey Newnes; Amy Baumgartner; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 4.866