Literature DB >> 30931604

Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices.

Enrico Longato1, Giada Acciaroli1, Andrea Facchinetti1, Alberto Maran2, Giovanni Sparacino1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many glycemic variability (GV) indices exist in the literature. In previous works, we demonstrated that a set of GV indices, extracted from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data, can distinguish between stages of diabetes progression. We showed that 25 indices driving a logistic regression classifier can differentiate between healthy and nonhealthy individuals; whereas 37 GV indices and four individual parameters, feeding a polynomial-kernel support vector machine (SVM), can further distinguish between impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The latter approach has some limitations to interpretability (complex model, extensive index pool). In this article, we try to obtain the same performance with a simpler classifier and a parsimonious subset of indices.
METHODS: We analyzed the data of 62 subjects with IGT or T2D. We selected 17 interpretable GV indices and four parameters (age, sex, BMI, waist circumference). We trained a SVM on the data of a baseline visit and tested it on the follow-up visit, comparing the results with the state-of-art methods.
RESULTS: The linear SVM fed by a reduced subset of 17 GV indices and four basic parameters achieved 82.3% accuracy, only marginally worse than the reference 87.1% (41-features polynomial-kernel SVM). Cross-validation accuracies were comparable (69.6% vs 72.5%).
CONCLUSION: The proposed SVM fed by 17 GV indices and four parameters can differentiate between IGT and T2D. Using a simpler model and a parsimonious set of indices caused only a slight accuracy deterioration, with significant advantages in terms of interpretability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; continuous glucose monitoring; glycemic variability; impaired glucose tolerance; support vector machine; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30931604      PMCID: PMC7196879          DOI: 10.1177/1932296819838856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  31 in total

1.  THE M-VALVE, AN INDEX OF BLOOD-SUGAR CONTROL IN DIABETICS.

Authors:  J SCHLICHTKRULL; O MUNCK; M JERSILD
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1965-01

2.  Glucose variability indices in type 1 diabetes: parsimonious set of indices revealed by sparse principal component analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino; Mattia Zanon; Stefania Guerra; Alberto Maran; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Dongyuan Xing; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; William V Tamborlane; Lori Laffel; Bruce A Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson; Stuart Weinzimer; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Katrina J Ruedy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Diabetes and Prediabetes Classification Using Glycemic Variability Indices From Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.

Authors:  Giada Acciaroli; Giovanni Sparacino; Liisa Hakaste; Andrea Facchinetti; Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio; Alessandro Palombit; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Rafael Gabriel; Jaime Aranda; Saturio Vega; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability.

Authors:  F J Service; G D Molnar; J W Rosevear; E Ackerman; L C Gatewood; W F Taylor
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  "J"-index. A new proposition of the assessment of current glucose control in diabetic patients.

Authors:  J M Wójcicki
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.936

7.  Glycemic Variability Percentage: A Novel Method for Assessing Glycemic Variability from Continuous Glucose Monitor Data.

Authors:  Thomas A Peyser; Andrew K Balo; Bruce A Buckingham; Irl B Hirsch; Arturo Garcia
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Ahmed H El-Laboudi; Ian F Godsland; Desmond G Johnston; Nick S Oliver
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Glucose Variability: Timing, Risk Analysis, and Relationship to Hypoglycemia in Diabetes.

Authors:  Boris Kovatchev; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Parsimonious Description of Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes by Sparse Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Fabris; Andrea Facchinetti; Giuseppe Fico; Francesco Sambo; Maria Teresa Arredondo; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-31
View more
  6 in total

1.  Computer-Aided Detection of Incidental Lumbar Spine Fractures from Routine Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Studies Using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classifier.

Authors:  Samir D Mehta; Ronnie Sebro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021.

Authors:  Nicole Y Xu; Kevin T Nguyen; Ashley Y DuBord; John Pickup; Jennifer L Sherr; Hazhir Teymourian; Eda Cengiz; Barry H Ginsberg; Claudio Cobelli; David Ahn; Riccardo Bellazzi; B Wayne Bequette; Laura Gandrud Pickett; Linda Parks; Elias K Spanakis; Umesh Masharani; Halis K Akturk; John S Melish; Sarah Kim; Gu Eon Kang; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Integration of SNP Disease Association, eQTL, and Enrichment Analyses to Identify Risk SNPs and Susceptibility Genes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Kun Huang; Yahui Wang; Erqiang Hu; Benliang Wei; Zhaona Song; Yuqing Zou; Luanfeng Ge; Lina Chen; Wan Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Analysis of detrended fluctuation function derived from continuous glucose monitoring may assist in distinguishing latent autoimmune diabetes in adults from T2DM.

Authors:  Liyin Zhang; Qi Tian; Keyu Guo; Jieru Wu; Jianan Ye; Zhiyi Ding; Qin Zhou; Gan Huang; Xia Li; Zhiguang Zhou; Lin Yang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Testing a very low-carbohydrate adaption of the Diabetes Prevention Program among adults with prediabetes: study protocol for the Lifestyle Education about prediabetes (LEAP) trial.

Authors:  Dina H Griauzde; Alison O'Brien; William S Yancy; Caroline R Richardson; Jamie Krinock; Melissa DeJonckheere; Deanna J M Isaman; Kaitlyn Vanias; Samuel Shopinski; Laura R Saslow
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Bioinformatic Reconstruction and Analysis of Gene Networks Related to Glucose Variability in Diabetes and Its Complications.

Authors:  Olga V Saik; Vadim V Klimontov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.