Luis C Fernandez1,2, Augusto Toriz3,4, Jorge Hernandez3, Norberto Sanchez3, Erick Linares3, Massiel Zenteno3, Adolfo Cuendis5, Jose Olivares6, Gustavo Guerrero4, Cesar F Cervantes4,7. 1. Hospital General Zona Norte, Puebla, Mexico. drluisfedz@hotmail.com. 2. Centro Integral de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2 Oriente 415, Col Centro, CP: 72760, San Pedro Cholula, Puebla, Mexico. drluisfedz@hotmail.com. 3. Hospital General Zona Norte, Puebla, Mexico. 4. Hospital General ISSSTE, Puebla, Mexico. 5. Hospital General "Dr. Manuel Gea Gonzalez", Mexico City, Mexico. 6. Hospital General ISSSTE, Mexicali, Mexico. 7. Centro Integral de Enfermedades Digestivas, 2 Oriente 415, Col Centro, CP: 72760, San Pedro Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the safety and feasibility of a running continuous unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc, Covidien, Mansfield, MA) for primary common bile duct closure while performing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). INTRODUCTION: LCBDE is nowadays the best approach for treating complex common bile duct lithiasis or cases where the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. It is clear that the primary closure of the common bile duct must be preferred over the T-tube drainage. The actual technical aspects offer room for improvement. We present our experience with barbed suture, for which recently, various fields of surgery have become interested in and which now has a series of studies that support it for several uses. METHODS: Between July 2012 and July 2014, 54 consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent LCBDE by a single surgeon. Perioperative outcomes and 30-day complications were recorded. RESULTS: Upon the completion of the exploration, 50 patients had primary common bile duct closure using knotless unidirectional barbed 3-0 V-Loc 90 suture, and 4 patients were excluded. All of the sutures were performed without knot tying. The procedure in all patients was successfully performed with no intraoperative complications. There were no bile leaks in the 50 patients or other postoperative complications such as infection, need for reintervention or death. CONCLUSION: The use of unidirectional knotless barbed suture (V-Loc 90) is safe, feasible and effective on LCBDE for primary common bile duct closure. The biliary leak rate is acceptably low and comparable to the rate reported in the literature. This report is our initial experience that needs further clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To describe the safety and feasibility of a running continuous unidirectional barbed suture (V-Loc, Covidien, Mansfield, MA) for primary common bile duct closure while performing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). INTRODUCTION:LCBDE is nowadays the best approach for treating complex common bile duct lithiasis or cases where the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. It is clear that the primary closure of the common bile duct must be preferred over the T-tube drainage. The actual technical aspects offer room for improvement. We present our experience with barbed suture, for which recently, various fields of surgery have become interested in and which now has a series of studies that support it for several uses. METHODS: Between July 2012 and July 2014, 54 consecutive patients with bile duct stones underwent LCBDE by a single surgeon. Perioperative outcomes and 30-day complications were recorded. RESULTS: Upon the completion of the exploration, 50 patients had primary common bile duct closure using knotless unidirectional barbed 3-0 V-Loc 90 suture, and 4 patients were excluded. All of the sutures were performed without knot tying. The procedure in all patients was successfully performed with no intraoperative complications. There were no bile leaks in the 50 patients or other postoperative complications such as infection, need for reintervention or death. CONCLUSION: The use of unidirectional knotless barbed suture (V-Loc 90) is safe, feasible and effective on LCBDE for primary common bile duct closure. The biliary leak rate is acceptably low and comparable to the rate reported in the literature. This report is our initial experience that needs further clinical trials.
Authors: Vito De Blasi; Olivier Facy; Martine Goergen; Virginie Poulain; Luigi De Magistris; Juan Santiago Azagra Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Marco Milone; Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno; Giuseppe Galloro; Paola Maietta; Paolo Bianco; Francesco Milone; Mario Musella Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Sebastian V Demyttenaere; Peter Nau; Matthew Henn; Catherine Beck; Jeffrey Zaruby; Michael Primavera; David Kirsch; Jeffrey Miller; James J Liu; Andrew Bellizzi; W Scott Melvin Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.058