OBJECTIVES: This biomechanical cadaver study was performed to compare the fixation stability of a standard lateral condylar buttress plate with a similar condylar buttress plate with the distal screws locked to the plate. Then the study was repeated with six additional matched femoral pairs to compare the locked plate with a standard 95-degree blade plate. DESIGN: Six matched pairs of mildly osteopenic femurs were selected, and each side was assigned randomly to fixation with either a standard lateral condylar buttress plate or a modified lateral condylar buttress plate with locked distal screws. The experiment was repeated with six additional matched pairs of femurs instrumented with either a modified lateral condylar buttress plate with locked distal screws or a standard 95-degree blade plate. INTERVENTION: The femurs were instrumented, and a gap osteotomy was created at the distal femoral metaphysis. The instrumented femurs were then mechanically tested in axial compression and bending/torsional loading to determine fixation stability; then they were loaded at 1,000 newtons for 10(5) cycles and retested for stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The displacement across the osteotomy gap at 100-newton and 1,000-newton axial loads was measured directly for each specimen before and after cycling. In addition, resistance to displacement in bending/torsional loading (newtons/centimeter) was determined from load/displacement curves, before and after cycling. RESULTS: The locked buttress plate provided significantly greater fixation stability than the standard plate both before and after cycling in axial loading. The locked buttress plate also proved significantly more stable in axial loading than the blade plate both before and after cycling. CONCLUSION: A condylar buttress plate with locked screws is a valid concept for improving fixation stability.
OBJECTIVES: This biomechanical cadaver study was performed to compare the fixation stability of a standard lateral condylar buttress plate with a similar condylar buttress plate with the distal screws locked to the plate. Then the study was repeated with six additional matched femoral pairs to compare the locked plate with a standard 95-degree blade plate. DESIGN: Six matched pairs of mildly osteopenic femurs were selected, and each side was assigned randomly to fixation with either a standard lateral condylar buttress plate or a modified lateral condylar buttress plate with locked distal screws. The experiment was repeated with six additional matched pairs of femurs instrumented with either a modified lateral condylar buttress plate with locked distal screws or a standard 95-degree blade plate. INTERVENTION: The femurs were instrumented, and a gap osteotomy was created at the distal femoral metaphysis. The instrumented femurs were then mechanically tested in axial compression and bending/torsional loading to determine fixation stability; then they were loaded at 1,000 newtons for 10(5) cycles and retested for stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The displacement across the osteotomy gap at 100-newton and 1,000-newton axial loads was measured directly for each specimen before and after cycling. In addition, resistance to displacement in bending/torsional loading (newtons/centimeter) was determined from load/displacement curves, before and after cycling. RESULTS: The locked buttress plate provided significantly greater fixation stability than the standard plate both before and after cycling in axial loading. The locked buttress plate also proved significantly more stable in axial loading than the blade plate both before and after cycling. CONCLUSION: A condylar buttress plate with locked screws is a valid concept for improving fixation stability.
Authors: Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Trevor J Lujan; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Peter Augat; Brigitte von Rechenberg; Maren Lesser; Steven M Madey Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marc Tompkins; David J Paller; Douglas C Moore; Joseph J Crisco; Richard M Terek Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Mark B Sommers; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey; Corey Vande Zanderschulp; Michael Bottlang Journal: J Biomech Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 2.712