Literature DB >> 3713288

The use of proxies in health surveys. Substantive and policy implications.

R R Mosely, F D Wolinsky.   

Abstract

It has traditionally been assumed that obtaining health and illness behavior data by proxy on household members who are not present during the actual interview presents no significant threats to the internal validity of subsequent analyses. Using data on the 78,439 adults interviewed in person or by proxy (about 37% of the total adult sample) as part of the 1978 Health Interview Survey, the authors examine whether the use of proxy respondents alters the results of empirical assessments of the behavioral model of health services utilization or the policy implications that can be derived from it. Two important findings emerge from these analyses. On the one hand, failing to consider explicitly the possibility of a proxy effect (i.e., including a proxy variable in the analyses) does not alter the effect parameters estimated for the behavioral model. On the other hand, failing to consider explicitly the effect of using proxies appears to underestimate slightly physician and hospital contact rates (by 4% and 2%, respectively), as well as the volume of physician utilization. The substantive and policy implications of these findings are discussed, as are two alternative explanations that suggest that proxy-respondents simply use fewer health services either because they are "too busy" or because they are in slightly better health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3713288     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198606000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  V Goel; K Iron; J I Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Assessing health in an urban neighborhood: community process, data results and implications for practice.

Authors:  M Idali Torres
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1998-06

3.  Comparing survey data on functional disability: the impact of some methodological differences.

Authors:  H S Picavet; G A van den Bos
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Systematic review of caregiver responses for patient health-related quality of life in adult cancer care.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Influence of proxy respondents in children's health interview surveys.

Authors:  L Rajmil; E Fernández; R Gispert; M Rué; J P Glutting; A Plasència; A Segura
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Differences between Proxy and Patient Assessments of Cancer Care Experiences and Quality Ratings.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Roee Gutman; Nancy L Keating; Vincent Mor; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Proxy and patient reports of health-related quality of life in a national cancer survey.

Authors:  Jessica K Roydhouse; Roee Gutman; Nancy L Keating; Vincent Mor; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Validation of a questionnaire for assessing fecal impaction in the elderly: impact of cognitive impairment, and using a proxy.

Authors:  Marta Barcelo; Maria Jose Jimenez-Cebrian; Manuel Diaz-Rubio; Alberto Lopez Rocha; Enrique Rey
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.921

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.