Literature DB >> 21954297

Decoding natural signals from the peripheral retina.

Brian C McCann1, Mary M Hayhoe, Wilson S Geisler.   

Abstract

Ganglion cells in the peripheral retina have lower density and larger receptive fields than in the fovea. Consequently, the visual signals relayed from the periphery have substantially lower resolution than those relayed by the fovea. The information contained in peripheral ganglion cell responses can be quantified by how well they predict the foveal ganglion cell responses to the same stimulus. We constructed a model of human ganglion cell outputs by combining existing measurements of the optical transfer function with the receptive field properties and sampling densities of midget (P) ganglion cells. We then simulated a spatial population of P-cell responses to image patches sampled from a large collection of luminance-calibrated natural images. Finally, we characterized the population response to each image patch, at each eccentricity, with two parameters of the spatial power spectrum of the responses: the average response contrast (standard deviation of the response patch) and the falloff in power with spatial frequency. The primary finding is that the optimal estimate of response contrast in the fovea is dependent on both the response contrast and the steepness of the falloff observed in the periphery. Humans could exploit this information when decoding peripheral signals to estimate contrasts, estimate blur levels, or select the most informative locations for saccadic eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21954297      PMCID: PMC3214635          DOI: 10.1167/11.10.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

Review 1.  Natural image statistics and neural representation.

Authors:  E P Simoncelli; B A Olshausen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Walter Makous
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina.

Authors:  C A Curcio; K A Allen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Contrast overconstancy.

Authors:  M A Georgeson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision.

Authors:  S J Galvin; R P O'Shea; A M Squire; D G Govan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  R Navarro; P Artal; D R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 8.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways?

Authors:  W H Merigan; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina.

Authors:  L J Croner; E Kaplan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels.

Authors:  M A Georgeson; G D Sullivan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.