Literature DB >> 9322153

Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax.

K Okanoya1, A Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

Songbirds develop their songs by imitating songs of adults. For song learning to proceed normally, the bird's hearing must remain intact throughout the song development process. In many species, song learning takes place during one period early in life, and no more new song elements are learned thereafter. In these so-called close-ended learners, it has long been assumed that once song development is complete, audition is no longer necessary to maintain the motor patterns of full song. However, many of these close-ended learners maintain plasticity in overall song organization; the number and the sequence of song elements included in a song of an individual vary from one utterance to another, although no new song elements are added or lost in adulthood. It is conceivable that these species rely on continued auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. The Bengalese finch is a close-ended learner that produces considerably variable songs as an adult. In the present study, we found that Bengalese finches require real-time auditory feedback for motor control even after song learning is complete; deafening adult finches resulted in development of abnormal song syntax in as little as 5 days. We also found that there was considerable individual variation in the degree of song deterioration after deafening. The neural mechanisms underlying adult song production in different species of songbirds may be more diverse than has been traditionally considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurobiol        ISSN: 0022-3034


  55 in total

1.  Singing in the brain.

Authors:  P Marler; A J Doupe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Short-term and long-term effects of vocal distortion on song maintenance in zebra finches.

Authors:  Gerald E Hough; Susan F Volman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Somatosensory feedback modulates the respiratory motor program of crystallized birdsong.

Authors:  Roderick A Suthers; Franz Goller; J Martin Wild
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  The role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance.

Authors:  Katherine Tschida; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Deafening-induced vocal deterioration in adult songbirds is reversed by disrupting a basal ganglia-forebrain circuit.

Authors:  K W Nordeen; E J Nordeen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Disrupting vagal feedback affects birdsong motor control.

Authors:  Jorge M Méndez; Analía G Dall'asén; Franz Goller
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Predicting plasticity: acute context-dependent changes to vocal performance predict long-term age-dependent changes.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Satoko Ono; Kazuo Okanoya; Yoshimasa Seki
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Peter L Rauske; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.