Literature DB >> 21358913

An evaluation of the value of choice-making opportunities in single-operant arrangements: simple fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.

Jeffrey H Tiger1, Karen A Toussaint, Christopher T Roath.   

Abstract

The current study compared the effects of choice and no-choice reinforcement conditions on the task responding of 3 children with autism across 2 single-operant paradigm reinforcer assessments. The first assessment employed simple fixed-ratio (FR) schedules; the second used progressive-ratio (PR) schedules. The latter assessment identified the differential strength of choice-making conditions in promoting task responding relative to no-choice conditions for 2 participants; no differential findings were obtained during the FR assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice; fixed-ratio schedule; progressive-ratio schedule; reinforcer assessment

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 21358913      PMCID： PMC2938952          DOI： 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN： 0021-8855


  14 in total

1.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  An outcome management program for extending advances in choice research into choice opportunities for supported workers with severe multiple disabilities.

Authors:  Dennis H Reid; Carolyn W Green; Marsha B Parsons
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

4.  Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  D C Lerman; B A Iwata; B Rainville; J D Adelinis; K Crosland; J Kogan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

5.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

Review 6.  On the applied use of progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry S Roane
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

7.  Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.

Authors:  R H Thompson; W W Fisher; S A Contrucci
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

8.  Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.

Authors:  R G Smith; B A Iwata; B A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

9.  An evaluation of the value of choice with preschool children.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Tiger; Gregory P Hanley; Emma Hernandez
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

10.  Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.

Authors:  M B Parsons; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990
View more
  2 in total

1.  Examining the reinforcing value of stimuli within social and non-social contexts in children with and without high-functioning autism.

Authors:  Melissa C Goldberg; Melissa J Allman; Louis P Hagopian; Mandy M Triggs; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Stewart H Mostofsky; Martha B Denckla; Iser G DeLeon
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 2.  Assessing Preferences for Animals in Children with Autism: A New Use for Video-Based Preference Assessment.

Authors:  Noémie A Guérin; Kerri E Rodriguez; Matthew T Brodhead; Marguerite E O'Haire
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.