Literature DB >> 9314805

Socioeconomic differences in hysterectomy: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

N F Marks1, D S Shinberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the relative gross and net predictive value of multiple socioeconomic status indicators for the likelihood of undergoing hysterectomy.
METHODS: Data from a sample of Wisconsin Longitudinal Study women respondents (n = 3326) followed for 35 years were analyzed by means of multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Women's own higher occupational status and greater family net worth were significant net predictors of a lower likelihood of hysterectomy. Women's own education was a significant bivariate predictor. Mental ability did not account for the education effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher education's association with a lower rate of hysterectomy is not due to ability, but to the opportunities that more-educated women have for higher-status employment and its health-related benefits. Measures of women's own occupational status should be included in future health surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314805      PMCID: PMC1380978          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Age, socioeconomic status, and health.

Authors:  J S House; R C Kessler; A R Herzog
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Socioeconomic status differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events.

Authors:  J D McLeod; R C Kessler
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1990-06

3.  Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M A Winkleby; D E Jatulis; E Frank; S P Fortmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Social/economic status and disease.

Authors:  M G Marmot; M Kogevinas; M A Elston
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?

Authors:  A Coulter; K McPherson; M Vessey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  A disaggregation of the relationship between socioeconomic status and psychological distress.

Authors:  R C Kessler
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  1982-12

7.  Characteristics of women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  E N Meilahn; K A Matthews; G Egeland; S F Kelsey
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality.

Authors:  A Antonovsky
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1967-04

9.  Hysterectomy in six European countries.

Authors:  P A van Keep; D Wildemeersch; P Lehert
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Gynaecology of middle-aged women--menstrual and reproductive histories.

Authors:  A Hagstad; S Johansson; C Wilhelmsson; P O Janson
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  12 in total

1.  Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Dharmalingam; I Pool; J Dickson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Hysterectomy prevalence by Hispanic ethnicity: evidence from a national survey.

Authors:  Kate M Brett; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Do not go gentle into that good night: the effect of retirement on subsequent mortality of U.S. Supreme Court justices, 1801-2006.

Authors:  Ross M Stolzenberg
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2011-11

4.  Hysterectomy and disability among U.S. women.

Authors:  Julia A Rivera Drew
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-08-02

5.  Negative attitudes and affect do not predict elective hysterectomy: a prospective analysis from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Gibson; Joyce T Bromberger; Gerson E Weiss; Rebecca C Thurston; MaryFran Sowers; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Cohort profile: Wisconsin longitudinal study (WLS).

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Deborah Carr; Carol Roan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Predicting adult health and mortality from adolescent facial characteristics in yearbook photographs.

Authors:  Eric N Reither; Robert M Hauser; Karen C Swallen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2009-02

Review 8.  Early life circumstances and their impact on menarche and menopause.

Authors:  Gita D Mishra; Rachel Cooper; Sarah E Tom; Diana Kuh
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2009-03

9.  Socioeconomic position and hysterectomy: a cross-cohort comparison of women in Australia and Great Britain.

Authors:  R Cooper; J Lucke; D A Lawlor; G Mishra; J-H Chang; S Ebrahim; D Kuh; A Dobson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Educational level, prevalence of hysterectomy, and age at amenorrhoea: a cross-sectional analysis of 9536 women from six population-based cohort studies in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Alexander Kluttig; Susanne Moebus; Henry Völzke; Klaus Berger; Karin Halina Greiser; Doris Stöckl; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.