Literature DB >> 6633270

Hysterectomy in six European countries.

P A van Keep, D Wildemeersch, P Lehert.   

Abstract

Gynaecologists have been criticized in recent years because of their attitude towards hysterectomy; it is often stated that they are too ready to consider hysterectomy to be indicated and that hysterectomies are carried out too frequently. In order to obtain insight into the incidence of hysterectomy, 2066 women between 40 and 70 yr of age, composing a sample covering 6 European countries, were asked whether they had undergone this operation. Of the total sample, 11.4% had been hysterectomized, the highest percentage being found in Italy (15.5%) and the lowest in France (8.5%). The most important factor that influenced the relative frequency of hysterectomy was age: the percentage of women who had undergone hysterectomy increased with age up to 55-59 yr, but fell thereafter. Another significant factor was civil status; there were fewer divorcees or widows at the moment of operation than married or never-married women. The relationship between the incidence of hysterectomy and age is a parabolic one. To explain this curve the authors postulate that two trends must have played a rôle: firstly; a greater need for hysterectomy with increasing age and, secondly a decrease in the reluctance of the gynaecological profession to perform a hysterectomy and/or of women to undergo this operation. Statistical analysis confirms the existence of this second trend over the period 1960-1975. The chances of a young woman losing her uterus before her 70th year went up linearly to 19.8% in 1975. By extrapolation a figure of 21% is obtained for 1980. Satisfaction with the result of the operation was lowest in Italy and Germany; satisfaction was also lowest in rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6633270     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(83)90001-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

1.  Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Dharmalingam; I Pool; J Dickson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Socioeconomic differences in hysterectomy: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  N F Marks; D S Shinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Hysterectomy and ovarian removal--a major health issue in the perimenopausal years.

Authors:  S Greenwood
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

4.  The epidemiological profile of hysterectomy in rural Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Yaqi Pan; Yongmei Liang; Chaoting Zhang; Qiuju Deng; Xiang Li; Mengfei Liu; Zhonghu He; Ying Liu; Jingjing Li; Tao Ning; Chuanhai Guo; Ruiping Xu; Lixin Zhang; Hong Cai; Yang Ke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Environment, human reproduction, menopause, and andropause.

Authors:  A Vermeulen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Effect of hysterectomy on incidence trends of endometrial and cervical cancer in Finland 1953-2010.

Authors:  R Luoto; J Raitanen; E Pukkala; A Anttila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  International differences in medical care practices.

Authors:  K McPherson
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.