Literature DB >> 2615667

Characteristics of women with hysterectomy.

E N Meilahn1, K A Matthews, G Egeland, S F Kelsey.   

Abstract

Socio-demographic and health information, including history of hysterectomy/oophorectomy, was obtained in a telephone survey of 2137 women aged 40-52. Subjects were randomly selected from a list of all women with a driver's license in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Results showed that 27.3% of women surveyed reported having had a hysterectomy. Women who had undergone hysterectomy were more often black, less educated, older and heavier; and reported less frequent alcohol consumption, younger age at birth of first child and earlier menarche than women who did not report hysterectomy. Forty-seven percent of blacks reported hysterectomy compared with 24% of whites (P less than 0.01) and blacks were significantly younger at surgery than whites (mean age 38.5 vs. 39.6 yr, P less than 0.05). Results of multivariate analyses showed age, black race, less than a college education, menarche before age 12 and having no children to be associated with an increased risk of hysterectomy (P less than 0.01). Additional multivariate analyses conducted separately for blacks and whites showed that, for whites but not blacks, the higher a woman's educational attainment the less likely she was to report having had a hysterectomy (P less than 0.01). Black women with no children more often reported hysterectomy than those with children (P less than 0.01), but this relationship was not found among whites. These findings show the distribution of hysterectomy in the population to vary by race, education and parity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2615667     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(89)90028-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

1.  Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

Authors:  A Dharmalingam; I Pool; J Dickson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census.

Authors:  R Luoto; I Keskimäki; A Reunanen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  A case-control study of menstrual factors in relation to breast cancer risk in African-American women.

Authors:  Jessica S B Beiler; Kangmin Zhu; Sandra Hunter; Kathleen Payne-Wilks; Chanel L Roland; Vernon M Chinchilli
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Hysterectomy prevalence by Hispanic ethnicity: evidence from a national survey.

Authors:  Kate M Brett; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Socioeconomic differences in hysterectomy: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  N F Marks; D S Shinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State: 1990-1996.

Authors:  E S Sills; J Saini; M S Applegate; M McGee; H F Gretz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Negative attitudes and affect do not predict elective hysterectomy: a prospective analysis from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Carolyn J Gibson; Joyce T Bromberger; Gerson E Weiss; Rebecca C Thurston; MaryFran Sowers; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Hysterectomy use: the correspondence between self-reports and hospital records.

Authors:  K M Brett; J H Madans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The impact of nonclinical factors on practice variations: the case of hysterectomies.

Authors:  S E Geller; L R Burns; D J Brailer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Socioeconomic variation in admission for diseases of female genital system and breast in a national cohort aged 15-43.

Authors:  D Kuh; S Stirling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.