Literature DB >> 10983207

Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand.

A Dharmalingam1, I Pool, J Dickson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence and biosocial correlates of hysterectomy.
METHODS: Data were from a 1995 national survey of women aged 20 to 59 years. We applied piecewise nonparametric exponential hazards models to a subsample aged 25 to 59 to estimate the effects of biosocial correlates on hysterectomy likelihood.
RESULTS: Risks of hysterectomy for 1991 through 1995 were lower than those before 1981. University-educated and professional women were less likely to undergo hysterectomy. Higher parity and intrauterine device side effects increased the risk.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms international results, especially those on education and occupation, but also points to ethnicity's mediating role. Education and occupation covary independently with hysterectomy. Analysis of time variance and periodicity showed declines in likelihood from 1981.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10983207      PMCID: PMC1447627          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.9.1455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  30 in total

1.  Tubal sterilization and the long-term risk of hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Stergachis; K K Shy; L C Grothaus; E H Wagner; J A Hecht; G Anderson; E H Normand; J Raboud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Hysterectomy. A critical review.

Authors:  G A Bachmann
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 0.142

3.  Socioeconomic differences in hysterectomy: the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  N F Marks; D S Shinberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Hysterectomy: past, present and future.

Authors:  R Pokras
Journal:  Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec

5.  Contraceptive practice in New Zealand.

Authors:  C Paul; D C Skegg; J Smeijers; G F Spears
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1988-12-14

6.  Incidence of hysterectomy and tubal ligation in public hospitals in south Australia, 1980-82.

Authors:  F Yusuf; D K Briggs
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1988-10

Review 7.  Do British women undergo too many or too few hysterectomies?

Authors:  A Coulter; K McPherson; M Vessey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The socioeconomic correlates of hysterectomies in the United States.

Authors:  K Kjerulff; P Langenberg; G Guzinski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Characteristics of women with hysterectomy.

Authors:  E N Meilahn; K A Matthews; G Egeland; S F Kelsey
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia.

Authors:  G Santow; M Bracher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  10 in total

1.  Age at menopause and determinants of hysterectomy and menopause in a multi-ethnic community: the Hilo Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Lorna Murphy; Lynn A Morrison; Angela M Reza; Daniel E Brown
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Black-White differences in hysterectomy prevalence: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Julie K Bower; Pamela J Schreiner; Barbara Sternfeld; Cora E Lewis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Relationship between hysterectomy and admixture in African American women.

Authors:  Lihong Qi; Rami Nassir; Roman Kosoy; Lorena Garcia; L Elaine Waetjen; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Margery Gass; John Robbins; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Early life circumstances and their impact on menarche and menopause.

Authors:  Gita D Mishra; Rachel Cooper; Sarah E Tom; Diana Kuh
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2009-03

Review 5.  Age at Menarche, Level of Education, Parity and the Risk of Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Population-Based Observational Studies.

Authors:  Louise F Wilson; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The epidemiological profile of hysterectomy in rural Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Yaqi Pan; Yongmei Liang; Chaoting Zhang; Qiuju Deng; Xiang Li; Mengfei Liu; Zhonghu He; Ying Liu; Jingjing Li; Tao Ning; Chuanhai Guo; Ruiping Xu; Lixin Zhang; Hong Cai; Yang Ke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Using geographically weighted Poisson regression to examine the association between socioeconomic factors and hysterectomy incidence in Wallonia, Belgium.

Authors:  Aline Poliart; Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou; Mady Ouédraogo; Philippe Collart; Dominique Dubourg; Sékou Samadoulougou
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Timing of menarche, childbearing and hysterectomy risk.

Authors:  Rachel Cooper; Rebecca Hardy; Diana Kuh
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Socioeconomic position and hysterectomy: a cross-cohort comparison of women in Australia and Great Britain.

Authors:  R Cooper; J Lucke; D A Lawlor; G Mishra; J-H Chang; S Ebrahim; D Kuh; A Dobson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Sapna Desai; Oona Mr Campbell; Tara Sinha; Ajay Mahal; Simon Cousens
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.