Literature DB >> 9306219

The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty.

S C Reed1, J Gollish.   

Abstract

Of the technical factors important in achieving a successful total knee arthroplasty, limb alignment has been demonstrated to be most influential in determining implant survival. Intramedullary femoral guide systems rely on placement of the intramedullary rod along the anatomic axis of the femur. In this article, the accuracy of the femoral intramedullary guide is investigated using radiographs and a mathematical model. The femoral anatomic axis was drawn on 40 consecutive, preoperative, 3-ft standing radiographs. Using a mathematical model, the potential angular error in the distal femoral cut from aberrant placement of the intramedullary rod was estimated. Calculated values correlated with measured values from plain radiographs and an intramedullary guide template. The anatomic axis was found to exit the distal femur at an average of 6.6 mm medial to the center of the femoral notch. Substantial malalignment error resulted from minor malposition of the intramedullary rod. Most books and diagrams demonstrating the use of intramedullary guides indicate that the entry point is at the center of the femoral notch. These results show that the true entry point is medial to the center of the notch, and rod placement error results in excessive valgus alignment. Preoperative drawing of the anatomic axis on a 3-ft or 18-inch anteroposterior radiograph is recommended. The results both demonstrate the importance of correct use of the guide and heighten cognizance among surgeons performing total knee arthroplasty as to the limitations of the intramedullary guides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9306219     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90141-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  38 in total

1.  Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; C Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Intraoperative assessment of resected condyle thickness in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Ho Noh; Chul Hee Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Ji-Hyeon Yim; Nathan A Netravali; William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus the conventional technique: how precise is navigation in clinical routine?

Authors:  Markus Tingart; Christian Lüring; Holger Bäthis; Johannes Beckmann; Joachim Grifka; Lars Perlick
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Hoser; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Alfred Hennerbichler; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Reliability of leg alignment using the OrthoPilot system depends on knee position: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; L Konstantinidis; P C Strohm; P Niemeyer; N P Suedkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Less invasive TKA: extramedullary femoral reference without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction.

Authors:  C Lüring; F Oczipka; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Sagittal cutting error changes femoral anteroposterior sizing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakahara; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ralf E Rosenberger; Christian Fink; Sebastian Quirbach; Rene Attal; Katja Tecklenburg; Christian Hoser
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.