Literature DB >> 9297957

Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.

M Hochman1, D Chiarello, C B Hochman, R Lopatkin, S Pergola.   

Abstract

A study was designed to determine if there are changes in the perception of pain when the flow rate and pressure of an injected anesthetic are precisely controlled. Fifty dentists were given contralateral palatal injections. One side was injected with the Wand injector, a new delivery system that uses a microprocessor and an electric motor to precisely regulate flow rate during administration. The control side was injected using a standard manual syringe, in which flow rate and pressure are operator-dependent and cannot be controlled accurately. The subjects used two subjective scales to describe their perceived pain experience. When their responses were analyzed the Wand injector was found to be two- to three-times less painful than the manual injection. The results were statistically significant (p < .001). The authors conclude that there is an optimal flow rate of anesthetic solution at which the perception of pain during an injection is minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9297957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Y State Dent J        ISSN: 0028-7571


  26 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacy of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) injection.

Authors:  Shelly Lee; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

2.  The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Geoffrey Steinkruger; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations.

Authors:  Kenneth L Reed; Stanley F Malamed; Andrea M Fonner
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

4.  Initial injection pressure for dental local anesthesia: effects on pain and anxiety.

Authors:  Masaru Kudo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

5.  Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Campanella; Antonio Libonati; Roberto Nardi; Vincenzo Angotti; Gianni Gallusi; Edoardo Montemurro; Maurizio D'Amario; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections.

Authors:  Eliezer Kaufman; Joel B Epstein; Eitan Naveh; Meir Gorsky; Anat Gross; Galit Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

7.  "Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial".

Authors:  S Berrendero; O Hriptulova; M P Salido; F Martínez-Rus; G Pradíes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A comparison of pain and anxiety associated with the administration of maxillary local analgesia with Wand and conventional technique.

Authors:  J F Tahmassebi; M Nikolaou; M S Duggal
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-06

9.  A clinical comparison of pain perception and extent of area anesthetized by Wand(®) and a traditional syringe.

Authors:  Meet Shah; Sumanth Shivaswamy; Sanjay Jain; Sonal Tambwekar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

10.  Pain and efficacy rating of a microprocessor-controlled metered injection system for local anaesthesia in minor hand surgery.

Authors:  André S Nimigan; Bing Siang Gan
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.