Literature DB >> 16252739

Initial injection pressure for dental local anesthesia: effects on pain and anxiety.

Masaru Kudo1.   

Abstract

This study quantitatively assessed injection pressure, pain, and anxiety at the start of injection of a local anesthetic into the oral mucosa, and confirmed the relationship between injection pressure and pain, as well as between injection pressure and anxiety. Twenty-eight healthy men were selected as subjects and a 0.5-inch (12 mm) 30-gauge disposable needle attached to a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (the Wand) was used. A 0.5 mL volume of local anesthetic solution was injected submucosally at a speed of either 30 or 160 s/mL. Three seconds after the start of local anesthetic injection, injection pressure was measured and pain and anxiety were assessed. Injection pressure was measured continuously in real time by using an invasive sphygmomanometer and analytical software, and pain was assessed on the Visual Analogue Scale and anxiety on the Faces Anxiety Scale. A significant correlation was evident between injection pressure and pain (rs = .579, P = .00124) and between intensity of injection pressure and state anxiety (rs = .479, P = .00979). It is therefore recommended that local anesthetic be injected under low pressure (less than 306 mm Hg) to minimize pain and anxiety among dental patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16252739      PMCID: PMC1586792          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[95:IIPFDL]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  9 in total

1.  Role of the anesthetic solution in intrapulpal anesthesia.

Authors:  J Birchfield; P A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Intrapulpal injection: factors related to effectiveness.

Authors:  J VanGheluwe; R Walton
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1997-01

3.  Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.

Authors:  M Hochman; D Chiarello; C B Hochman; R Lopatkin; S Pergola
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep

4.  The pressures created by inferior alveolar injections.

Authors:  J P Rood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1978-05-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales.

Authors:  R C Aitken
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1969-10

6.  An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.

Authors:  M W Heft; S R Parker
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Pressures created by dental injections.

Authors:  E L Pashley; R Nelson; D H Pashley
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine.

Authors:  R E Primosch; L Robinson
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.522

9.  Influence of anesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand Local Anesthetic System on pain response to palatal injections.

Authors:  Robert E Primosch; Richard Brooks
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.522

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Utility of Vibratory Stimulation for Reducing Intraoral Injection Pain.

Authors:  Ozgur Erdogan; Anatachai Sinsawat; Sudeep Pawa; Duangtawan Rintanalert; Suchada Vuddhakanok
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

2.  The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Geoffrey Steinkruger; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  Administration of anesthetics using metal syringes. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Maria Tzafalia; Jean-Louis Sixou
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

4.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

5.  The Effect of 2 Injection Speeds on Local Anesthetic Discomfort During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks.

Authors:  Marcelo Rodrigo de Souza Melo; Mark Jon Santana Sabey; Carla Juliane Lima; Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

6.  Comparisons of two different doses of fentanyl for procedural analgesia during epidural catheter placement: a double-blind prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Takeshi Yano; Shigeaki Okubo; Hiroaki Naruo; Tatsuma Iwasaki; Isao Tsuneyoshi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Observational and descriptive analysis of broken dental needles: a case series.

Authors:  Lorena Batista Sandre; Elvidio de Paula E Silva; Antonio Eduardo Ribeiro Izidro; Waltencyr Mendes Pereira Neto; Cícero André da Costa Moraes; Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Clinical Comparison: Fast-Acting and Traditional Topical Dental Anesthetic.

Authors:  Arthur C DiMarco; Ann O'Kelley Wetmore
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

9.  Success rate of IR midazolam sedation in combination with C-CLAD in pediatric dental patients-a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Malka Ashkenazi; Anat Baniel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The most painful site of maxillary anterior infiltrations.

Authors:  Roohollah Sharifi; Hesamedin Nazari; Peik Bolourchi; Saber Khazaei; Masoud Parirokh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.