Literature DB >> 16596910

A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections.

Eliezer Kaufman1, Joel B Epstein, Eitan Naveh, Meir Gorsky, Anat Gross, Galit Cohen.   

Abstract

Intraoral local anesthesia is essential for delivering dental care. However, it is often perceived by some patients as the most painful and in some instances as the only painful part of the treatment, leading in extreme cases to avoidance of dental care. The present study measured the variables of pain, pressure, and discomfort caused by 4 commonly used local anesthesia injections: local infiltration, mental nerve block, inferior alveolar nerve block, and periodontal ligament injections. Patients were asked to grade pain, discomfort, and pressure on a visual analog scale as associated with needle insertion, operator finger position in the mouth, and pressure at injection. The inferior alveolar injection was graded to be the most painful followed by periodontal ligament and then mental nerve block injections. The periodontal ligament injections yielded the highest pressure scores. The inferior alveolar block injection yielded significantly more discomfort than local infiltration and mental nerve block injections when comparing finger and needle position. Local infiltration in the anterior maxillary region yielded the highest needle insertion and finger position discomfort scores. The present study suggests that the dental operator should be aware of local anesthesia injection pain, pressure, and discomfort together with efficacy of technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16596910      PMCID: PMC1586799          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[122:ASP]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  27 in total

Review 1.  Local anesthesia: advances in agents and techniques.

Authors:  J Mel Hawkins; Paul A Moore
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10

2.  The effect of warming local anesthetic solutions prior to injection.

Authors:  K B Rogers; A F Fielding; S W Markiewicz
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

3.  The significance of needle gauge in dental injections.

Authors:  L R Farsakian; F S Weine
Journal:  Compendium       Date:  1991-04

4.  Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.

Authors:  M Hochman; D Chiarello; C B Hochman; R Lopatkin; S Pergola
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep

5.  Four dimensions of fear of dental injections.

Authors:  P Milgrom; S E Coldwell; T Getz; P Weinstein; D S Ramsay
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Patient and dentist satisfaction with a computerized local anesthetic injection system.

Authors:  E G Grace; D M Barnes; M D Macek; N Tatum
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2000-09

7.  Electronic anesthesia versus topical anesthesia for the control of injection pain.

Authors:  F Quarnstrom; E N Libed
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Reactions of children to maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injections.

Authors:  D Ram; B Peretz
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

Review 9.  A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.

Authors:  M J Friedman; M N Hochman
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  1997-10

10.  Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.

Authors:  Keith D Allen; Darin Kotil; Robert E Larzelere; Susan Hutfless; Soraya Beiraghi
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

View more
  28 in total

1.  Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012.

Authors:  N Shabazfar; M Daubländer; B Al-Nawas; P W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Administration of anesthetics using metal syringes. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Maria Tzafalia; Jean-Louis Sixou
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

3.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

4.  Anesthetic efficacies of intrapapillary injection in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular premolar extraction: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Duangkamon Wongpang; Anupong Makeudom; Thanapat Sastraruji; Sakornrat Khongkhunthian; Suttichai Krisanaprakornkit; Chayarop Supanchart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Use of Pre-Injection Diffusion of Local Anaesthetic as a Means of Reducing Needle Penetration Discomfort.

Authors:  Ozgur Onder Kuscu; Nuket Sandalli; Esber Caglar; John G Meechan
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2014-09

6.  Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; A Adubae; I Buttchereit; D G E Thiem; M Daubländer; B Frerich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Florian Schnaith; Caroline M E Van Aken; Anne Köntges; Vinay V Kumar; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Efficacy of Pulpal Anesthesia Using a Needle-less Syringe.

Authors:  Coleman Christensen; Stephen C Arnason; Ross Oates; Michael Crabtree; John W Kersey; Kraig S Vandewalle
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2020-12-01

9.  Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.

Authors:  K Jorgenson; L Burbridge; B Cole
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-12-12

10.  The effect of hypnosis on pain relief due to injection of dental infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  Soma Arabzade Moghadam; Fayegh Yousefi; Sahand Saad
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.