Literature DB >> 17177591

The effects of a 2-stage injection technique on inferior alveolar nerve block injection pain.

John Nusstein1, Geoffrey Steinkruger, Al Reader, Mike Beck, Joel Weaver.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover study was to compare the pain of a traditional 1-stage inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block injection to a 2-stage IAN block technique. Using a crossover design, 51 subjects randomly received, in a single-blinded manner, either the traditional IAN block or the 2-stage IAN block in 2 appointments spaced at least 1 week apart. For the 2-stage injection, the needle was inserted submucosally and 0.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was slowly given over 1 minute. After 5 minutes, the needle was reinserted and advanced to the target site (needle placement), and 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was deposited. For the traditional IAN block, following needle penetration, the needle was advanced while depositing 0.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (needle placement) and then 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was deposited at the target site. A Heft-Parker visual analogue scale was used to measure the pain of needle insertion, needle placement, and anesthetic solution deposition. There were no significant differences, as analyzed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, between needle insertion and solution deposition for the 2 techniques in men or women. However, there was significantly less pain with the 2-stage injection for needle placement in women. In conclusion, the 2-stage injection significantly reduced the pain of needle placement for women when compared to the traditional IAN technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17177591      PMCID: PMC1705832          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[126:TEOASI]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  29 in total

1.  Efficacy of mandibular topical anesthesia varies with the site of administration.

Authors:  O Nakanishi; D Haas; T Ishikawa; S Kameyama; M Nishi
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

2.  A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks.

Authors:  Philip Mikesell; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.

Authors:  M Hochman; D Chiarello; C B Hochman; R Lopatkin; S Pergola
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep

4.  Comparison of a controlled injection pressure system with a conventional technique.

Authors:  G G Goodell; F J Gallagher; B K Nicoll
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-07

5.  An evaluation of volumes and concentrations of lidocaine in human inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  D L Vreeland; A Reader; M Beck; W Meyers; J Weaver
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Gender and age differences in attitudes to dental pain and dental control.

Authors:  A Liddell; D Locker
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.383

7.  The wand versus traditional injection for mandibular nerve block in children and adolescents: perceived pain and time of onset.

Authors:  A M Palm; U Kirkegaard; S Poulsen
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.874

8.  An evaluation of the incisive nerve block and combination inferior alveolar and incisive nerve blocks in mandibular anesthesia.

Authors:  R A Nist; A Reader; M Beck; W J Meyers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Sex differences and personality factors in responsivity to pain.

Authors:  M W Otto; M J Dougher
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1985-10

10.  Topical anesthesia: differentiating the pharmacological and psychological contributions to efficacy.

Authors:  M D Martin; D S Ramsay; C Whitney; L Fiset; P Weinstein
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1994
View more
  7 in total

1.  Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Pain Using a Computer-Controlled Local Anesthetic Device (CCLAD): A Prospective, Randomized Study.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Chase Crowley; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2018

2.  The Effect of 2 Injection Speeds on Local Anesthetic Discomfort During Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks.

Authors:  Marcelo Rodrigo de Souza Melo; Mark Jon Santana Sabey; Carla Juliane Lima; Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza; Francisco Carlos Groppo
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

3.  Evaluation of 2-Stage Injection Technique in Children.

Authors:  Valasingam Sandeep; Manikya Kumar; P Jyostna; Vijay Duggi
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

4.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks.

Authors:  Michael Whitcomb; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

5.  Comparison of Patient Comfort During the First Stage of Conventional Versus Modified Two-Stage Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rose Maria Joseph; Ashwin P Rao; N Srikant; Y M Karuna; P Anupama Nayak
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

6.  Hemodynamic changes and pain perception-related anxiety after experiencing an impacted-tooth removal: clinical practice outcome.

Authors:  Somchart Raocharernporn; Kiatanant Boonsiriseth; Manop Khanijou; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-06-29

7.  Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen Effect on IANB Injection Pain and Mandibular Pulpal Anesthesia in Asymptomatic Subjects.

Authors:  Ben Kushnir; Sara Fowler; Melissa Drum; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck Dds
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2021-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.