Literature DB >> 9280194

Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data and recommendations for future research directions. Summary of a conference sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and American Society for Clinical Nutrition.

S Klein, J Kinney, K Jeejeebhoy, D Alpers, M Hellerstein, M Murray, P Twomey.   

Abstract

In the last 30 years, marked advances in enteral feeding techniques, venous access, and enteral and parenteral nutrient formulations have made it possible to provide nutrition support to almost all patients. Despite the abundant medical literature and widespread use of nutritional therapy, many areas of nutrition support remain controversial. Therefore, the leadership at the National Institutes of Health, The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, and The American Society for Clinical Nutrition convened an advisory committee to perform a critical review of the current medical literature evaluating the clinical use of nutrition support; the goal was to assess our current body of knowledge and to identify the issues that deserve further investigation. The panel was divided into five groups to evaluate the following areas: nutrition assessment, nutrition support in patients with gastrointestinal diseases, nutrition support in wasting diseases, nutrition support in critically ill patients, and perioperative nutrition support. The findings from each group are summarized in this report. This document is not meant to establish practice guidelines for nutrition support. The use of nutritional therapy requires a careful integration of data from pertinent clinical trials, clinical expertise in the illness or injury being treated, clinical expertise in nutritional therapy, and input from the patient and his/her family. (Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 21:133-156, 1997).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9280194     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/66.3.683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  37 in total

Review 1.  Clinical nutrition: 1. Protein-energy malnutrition in the inpatient.

Authors:  L J Hoffer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Substitution of standard soybean oil with olive oil-based lipid emulsion in parenteral nutrition: comparison of vascular, metabolic, and inflammatory effects.

Authors:  Joselita Siqueira; Dawn Smiley; Christopher Newton; Ngoc-Anh Le; Aidar R Gosmanov; Ronnie Spiegelman; Limin Peng; Samantha J Osteen; Dean P Jones; Arshed A Quyyumi; Thomas R Ziegler; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  No, the glycaemic target in the critically ill should not be < or = 6.1 mmol/l.

Authors:  J M Miles; M M McMahon; W L Isley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kiyoko Ebisawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  [Enteral nutrition].

Authors:  M Pirlich; H Lochs; J Ockenga
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  [Indication for artificial nutrition: enteral and parenteral nutrition].

Authors:  A Schneider; M Momma; M P Manns
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.743

7.  Does Total Parenteral Nutrition Increase the Mortality of Patients with Severe Sepsis in the ICU?

Authors:  Huriye Berk Takır; Zuhal Karakurt; Cüneyt Saltürk; Merih Balcı; Feyza Kargın; Özlem Yazıcıoğlu Moçin; Gökay Güngör; Ece Çelik; Özkan Devran; Murat Yalçınsoy; İpek Özmen; Nalan Adıgüzel
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Adrian S Dobs; Ralph V Boccia; Christopher C Croot; Nashat Y Gabrail; James T Dalton; Michael L Hancock; Mary A Johnston; Mitchell S Steiner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Bernard Bochner; James Catto; Alvin C Goh; John Kelly; Hiten D Patel; Raj S Pruthi; George N Thalmann; Mihir Desai
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Hyperglycemia during total parenteral nutrition: an important marker of poor outcome and mortality in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Pasquel; Ronnie Spiegelman; Megan McCauley; Dawn Smiley; Denise Umpierrez; Rachel Johnson; Mary Rhee; Chelsea Gatcliffe; Erica Lin; Erica Umpierrez; Limin Peng; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.