Takero Mazaki1, Kiyoko Ebisawa. 1. Department of Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Nihon University Nerima-Hikarigaoka Hospital, 2-11-1 Hikarigaoka, Nerima-ku, Tokyo 179-0072, Japan. tmazaki@med.nihon-u.ac.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although previous studies recommend the use of enteral nutrition (EN), the benefit of EN after elective gastrointestinal surgery has not been comprehensively demonstrated as through a meta-analysis. Our aim is to determine whether enteral nutrition is more beneficial than parenteral nutrition. METHODS: A search was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and bibliographic reviews. The trials were based on randomization, gastrointestinal surgery, and the reporting of at least one of the following end points: any complication, any infectious complication, mortality, wound infection and dehiscence, anastomotic leak, intraabdominal abscess, pneumonia, respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, renal failure, any adverse effect, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine trials, which included 2,552 patients, met the criteria. EN was beneficial in the reduction of any complication (relative risk (RR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.99; P = 0.04), any infectious complication (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; P = 0.001), anastomotic leak (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03), intraabdominal abscess (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03), and duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.25-0.38; P = 0.02). There were no clear benefits in any of the other complications. CONCLUSION: The present findings would lead us to recommend the use of EN rather than PN when possible and indicated.
BACKGROUND: Although previous studies recommend the use of enteral nutrition (EN), the benefit of EN after elective gastrointestinal surgery has not been comprehensively demonstrated as through a meta-analysis. Our aim is to determine whether enteral nutrition is more beneficial than parenteral nutrition. METHODS: A search was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library electronic databases, and bibliographic reviews. The trials were based on randomization, gastrointestinal surgery, and the reporting of at least one of the following end points: any complication, any infectious complication, mortality, wound infection and dehiscence, anastomotic leak, intraabdominal abscess, pneumonia, respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, renal failure, any adverse effect, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine trials, which included 2,552 patients, met the criteria. EN was beneficial in the reduction of any complication (relative risk (RR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.99; P = 0.04), any infectious complication (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.86; P = 0.001), anastomotic leak (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.95; P = 0.03), intraabdominal abscess (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; P = 0.03), and duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.25-0.38; P = 0.02). There were no clear benefits in any of the other complications. CONCLUSION: The present findings would lead us to recommend the use of EN rather than PN when possible and indicated.
Authors: Didier Keh; Thomas Boehnke; Steffen Weber-Cartens; Christina Schulz; Olaf Ahlers; Sven Bercker; Hans-Dieter Volk; Wolf-Dietrich Doecke; Konrad J Falke; Herwig Gerlach Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-11-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter Declercq; Gunter De Win; Frank Van der Aa; Elodie Beels; Beels Elodie; Lorenz Van der Linden; Hendrik Van Poppel; Ludo Willems; Willems Ludo; Isabel Spriet; Spriet Isabel Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2015-02-10
Authors: Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Luiz Gonzaga Torres Júnior; Fernando Augusto de Vasconcellos Santos; Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Sadeesh K Srinathan; Tamara Hamin; Stephen Walter; A Lawrence Tan; Helmut W Unruh; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Kfir Ben-David; Tad Kim; Angel M Caban; Georgios Rossidis; Sara S Rodriguez; Steven N Hochwald Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 3.452