Literature DB >> 23499390

Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Adrian S Dobs1, Ralph V Boccia, Christopher C Croot, Nashat Y Gabrail, James T Dalton, Michael L Hancock, Mary A Johnston, Mitchell S Steiner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer-induced muscle wasting begins early in the course of a patient's malignant disease, resulting in declining physical function and other detrimental clinical consequences. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, in patients with cancer.
METHODS: We enrolled male (>45 years) and female (postmenopausal) patients with cancer who were not obese and who had at least 2% weight loss in the previous 6 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio, by computer generated list, block size three, stratified by cancer type) to receive once-daily oral enobosarm 1 mg, 3 mg, or placebo for up to 113 days at US and Argentinian oncology clinics. The sponsor, study personnel, and participants were masked to assignment. The primary endpoint was change in total lean body mass from baseline, assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Efficacy analyses were done only in patients who had a baseline and an on-treatment assessment in the protocol-specified window of within 10 days before baseline or first study drug, and within 10 days of day 113 or end of study (evaluable efficacy population). Adverse events and other safety measurements were assessed in the intention-to-treat (safety) population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00467844.
FINDINGS: Enrolment started on July 3, 2007, and the last patient completed the trial on Aug 1, 2008. 159 patients were analysed for safety (placebo, n=52; enobosarm 1 mg, n=53; enobosarm 3 mg, n=54). The evaluable efficacy population included 100 participants (placebo, n=34; enobosarm 1 mg, n=32; enobosarm 3 mg, n=34). Compared with baseline, significant increases in total lean body mass by day 113 or end of study were noted in both enobosarm groups (enobosarm 1 mg median 1·5 kg, range -2·1 to 12·6, p=0·0012; enodosarm 3 mg 1·0 kg, -4·8 to 11·5, p=0·046). Change in total lean body mass within the placebo group (median 0·02 kg, range -5·8 to 6·7) was not significant (p=0·88). The most common serious adverse events were malignant neoplasm progression (eight of 52 [15%] with placebo vs five of 53 [9%] with enobosarm 1 mg vs seven of 54 [13%] with enobosarm 3 mg), pneumonia (two [4%] vs two [4%] vs three [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (three [6%vs one [2%] vs none). None of these events were deemed related to study drug.
INTERPRETATION: Cancer cachexia is an unmet medical need and our data suggest that use of enobosarm might lead to improvements in lean body mass, without the toxic effects associated with androgens and progestational agents. FUNDING: GTx.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23499390      PMCID: PMC4898053          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70055-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  32 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review.

Authors:  Wim G M Janssen; Hans B J Bussmann; Henk J Stam
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-09

2.  Steroidal androgens and nonsteroidal, tissue-selective androgen receptor modulator, S-22, regulate androgen receptor function through distinct genomic and nongenomic signaling pathways.

Authors:  Ramesh Narayanan; Christopher C Coss; Muralimohan Yepuru; Jeffrey D Kearbey; Duane D Miller; James T Dalton
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2008-09-18

Review 3.  ABC of palliative care. Anorexia, cachexia, and nutrition.

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-08

Review 4.  Tesamorelin: a review of its use in the management of HIV-associated lipodystrophy.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Value of measuring muscle performance to assess changes in lean mass with testosterone and growth hormone supplementation.

Authors:  E Todd Schroeder; Jiaxiu He; Kevin E Yarasheski; Ellen F Binder; Carmen Castaneda-Sceppa; Shalender Bhasin; Christina M Dieli-Conwright; Miwa Kawakubo; Ronenn Roubenoff; Stanley P Azen; Fred R Sattler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Structural basis for accommodation of nonsteroidal ligands in the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Casey E Bohl; Duane D Miller; Jiyun Chen; Charles E Bell; James T Dalton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Clinical review 138: Anabolic-androgenic steroid therapy in the treatment of chronic diseases.

Authors:  S Basaria; J T Wahlstrom; A S Dobs
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Tests of muscle strength and physical function: reliability and discrimination of performance in younger and older men and older men with mobility limitations.

Authors:  Nathan K LeBrasseur; Shalender Bhasin; Renee Miciek; Thomas W Storer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Growth hormone improves lean body mass, physical performance, and quality of life in subjects with HIV-associated weight loss or wasting on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Graeme J Moyle; Eric S Daar; Joseph M Gertner; Donald P Kotler; Jean-Claude Melchior; Fanny O'brien; Elisabeth Svanberg
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Estimation of Cachexia among Cancer Patients Based on Four Definitions.

Authors:  Kathleen M Fox; John M Brooks; Shravanthi R Gandra; Richard Markus; Chiun-Fang Chiou
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.375

View more
  106 in total

Review 1.  Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators: Current Knowledge and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Zachary J Solomon; Jorge Rivera Mirabal; Daniel J Mazur; Taylor P Kohn; Larry I Lipshultz; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  Targeting the androgen receptor in breast cancer.

Authors:  KeeMing Chia; Megan O'Brien; Myles Brown; Elgene Lim
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of the selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024(Enobosarm) with itraconazole, rifampin, probenecid, celecoxib and rosuvastatin.

Authors:  Christopher C Coss; Amanda Jones; James T Dalton
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Research priorities in cancer cachexia: The University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Research Base Symposium on Cancer Cachexia and Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Richard F Dunne; Karen M Mustian; Jose M Garcia; William Dale; Reid Hayward; Breton Roussel; Mary M Buschmann; Bette J Caan; Calvin L Cole; Fergal J Fleming; Joe V Chakkalakal; David C Linehan; Aram F Hezel; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 5.  What is next after anamorelin?

Authors:  Jose M Garcia
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 6.  Bone Pain and Muscle Weakness in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Daniel P Milgrom; Neha L Lad; Leonidas G Koniaris; Teresa A Zimmers
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of the selective androgen receptor modulator, GSK2881078, in healthy men and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Richard V Clark; Ann C Walker; Susan Andrews; Philip Turnbull; Jeffrey A Wald; Mindy H Magee
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Therapies for musculoskeletal disease: can we treat two birds with one stone?

Authors:  Christian M Girgis; Nancy Mokbel; Douglas J Digirolamo
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Dennis T Villareal
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 10.  Gaps in nutritional research among older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn J Presley; Efrat Dotan; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Aminah Jatoi; Supriya G Mohile; Elizabeth Won; Shabbir Alibhai; Deepak Kilari; Robert Harrison; Heidi D Klepin; Tanya M Wildes; Karen Mustian; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.