Literature DB >> 9278827

Unindicated preoperative testing: ASA physical status and financial implications.

A W Vogt1, L C Henson.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the ordering of unindicated preoperative laboratory tests is different for healthy (ASA physical status I and II) versus sicker (ASA physical status III) patients, and to examine the financial implications at our institution of unindicated preoperative testing.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 383 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery and seen by an anesthesiologist in the Preoperative Clinic. Complete data was available for 312 patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperative laboratory tests ordered by the surgeon were compared to those tests considered indicated by one of several anesthesiologists for ASA physical status I and II versus ASA physical status III patients. An average of 72.5% of tests ordered by surgeons were considered not indicated by the anesthesiologists. ASA physical status III patients had significantly fewer unindicated complete blood count, platelet count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, chemistry 12 profile, and chest radiography orders than did ASA physical status I and II patients. Our hospital could generate approximately $80,000 in variable and semifixed cost savings by eliminating these unindicated preoperative tests for the 5,100 patients seen in Preoperative Clinic annually (29% of the total surgical patients).
CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of preoperative tests ordered by surgeons at our institution are not indicated. Eliminating unindicated tests would cut hospital revenues in a climate where testing is fee-for-service and would save the hospital money in a managed-care or capitated system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9278827     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00060-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of knowledge of perioperative care in primary care residents versus anesthesiology residents.

Authors:  Adebola O Adesanya; Girish P Joshi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-07

2.  Impact of new guidelines on physicians' ordering of preoperative tests.

Authors:  C A Mancuso
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay J Jinkins; Abhishek D Parmar; Yimei Han; Casey B Duncan; Kristin M Sheffield; Kimberly M Brown; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Effect of routine pre-anesthetic laboratory screening on pre-operative anesthesia-related decision-making in healthy dogs.

Authors:  Krista Mitchell; Michele Barletta; Jane Quandt; Molly Shepard; Stephanie Kleine; Erik Hofmeister
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  It is a good time to expand your circle!

Authors:  Stephan R Thilen; Bobbie Jean Sweitzer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Utilization of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ryan K Schmocker; David J Vanness; Caprice C Greenberg; Jeff A Havlena; Noelle K LoConte; Jennifer M Weiss; Heather B Neuman; Glen Leverson; Maureen A Smith; Emily R Winslow
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  House Officer-Driven Reduction in Laboratory Utilization.

Authors:  Bernard Tawfik; J B Collins; Nora F Fino; David P Miller
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Quality improvement in preoperative assessment by implementation of an electronic decision support tool.

Authors:  Maria Flamm; Gerhard Fritsch; Martin Hysek; Sabine Klausner; Karl Entacher; Sigrid Panisch; Andreas C Soennichsen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Preoperative laboratory testing in patients undergoing elective, low-risk ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Kimberly M Brown; Yimei Han; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Patient specific or routine preoperative workup in septoplasty: which one is cost-effective?

Authors:  Haşmet Yazıcı; Hayrettin Daşkaya; Sedat Doğan; İlknur Haberal; Taner Çiftçi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.