Literature DB >> 23889947

Current trends in preoperative biliary stenting in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Lindsay J Jinkins1, Abhishek D Parmar, Yimei Han, Casey B Duncan, Kristin M Sheffield, Kimberly M Brown, Taylor S Riall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sufficient evidence suggests that preoperative biliary stenting is associated with increased complication rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and linked Medicare claims data (1992-2007) were used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. We evaluated trends in the use of preoperative biliary stenting, timing of physician visits relative to stenting, and time to surgical resection and symptoms in stented and unstented patients.
RESULTS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 2,573 patients, and 52.6% of patients underwent preoperative biliary stenting (N = 1,354). Of these, 75.3% underwent endoscopic stenting only, 18.9% received a percutaneous stent, and 5.8% underwent both procedures. The overall stenting rate increased from 29.6% of patients between 1992 and 1995 to 59.1% between 2004 and 2007 (P < .0001). Preoperative stenting was more common in patients with jaundice, cholangitis, pruritus, or coagulopathy (P < .05 for all). Of stented patients, 77.7% had had a stent placed prior to seeing a surgeon. Stenting prior to surgical consultation was associated with longer indwelling stent time compared to stenting after surgical consultation (37.3 vs 27.0 days, P < .0001). In addition, stented patients had longer times from surgeon visit to pancreatectomy than those who had not received stents (24.2 days vs 17.2 days, P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Use of preoperative biliary stenting doubled between 1992 and 2007 despite evidence that stenting is associated with increased perioperative infectious complications. The majority of stenting occurred prior to surgical consultation and is associated with significant delay in time to operation. Surgeons should be involved early in order to prevent unnecessary stenting and improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889947      PMCID: PMC3728700          DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  40 in total

1.  Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M E Martignoni; M Wagner; L Krähenbühl; C A Redaelli; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  O D Schein; J Katz; E B Bass; J M Tielsch; L H Lubomski; M A Feldman; B G Petty; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The effect of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M E Sewnath; R S Birjmohun; E A Rauws; K Huibregtse; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage.

Authors:  S Srivastava; S S Sikora; A Kumar; R Saxena; V K Kapoor
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Preoperative endoscopic stent placement before pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Martha M A Saleh; Peter Nørregaard; Henrik L Jørgensen; Per K Andersen; Peter Matzen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P W Pisters; W A Hudec; K R Hess; J E Lee; J N Vauthey; S Lahoti; I Raijman; D B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P Jagannath; V Dhir; S Shrikhande; R C Shah; P Mullerpatan; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Do preoperative biliary stents increase postpancreaticoduodenectomy complications?

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The effect of preoperative biliary stenting on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Pamela Hodul; Steve Creech; Jack Pickleman; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 10.  A meta-analysis on the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Miguel E Sewnath; Thomas M Karsten; Martin H Prins; Erik J A Rauws; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  25 in total

1.  Percutaneous biliary drainage is oncologically inferior to endoscopic drainage: a propensity score matching analysis in resectable distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kenichi Komaya; Tomoki Ebata; Yasuyuki Fukami; Eiji Sakamoto; Hideo Miyake; Daisuke Takara; Kenji Wakai; Masato Nagino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Current status of preoperative drainage for distal biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Harutoshi Sugiyama; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Yuji Sakai; Rintaro Mikata; Shin Yasui; Yuto Watanabe; Dai Sakamoto; Masato Nakamura; Reina Sasaki; Jun-Ichi Senoo; Yuko Kusakabe; Masahiro Hayashi; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-28

3.  Unnecessary preoperative biliary drainage: impact on perioperative outcomes of resectable periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Cazauran; Julie Perinel; Vahan Kepenekian; Michel El Bechwaty; Gennaro Nappo; Mathieu Pioche; Thierry Ponchon; Mustapha Adham
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Effectiveness and risk of biliary drainage prior to pancreatoduodenectomy: review of current status.

Authors:  Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian; David Fuks; Raffaele Dalla Valle; Manuela Cesaretti; Vincenzo Violi; Renato Costi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Current status of preoperative biliary drainage.

Authors:  Junko Umeda; Takao Itoi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Perioperative outcome of Whipple's procedure with special attention to the impact of preoperative biliary drainage: a real-life scenario.

Authors:  Sukanta Ray; Somak Das; Tuhin Subhra Mandal; Koustav Jana; Roby Das; Dilip Kumar; Zuber Ansari; Sujan Khamrui
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 7.  Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter?

Authors:  Daniel M Halperin; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Cholangitis in the postoperative course after biliodigestive anastomosis.

Authors:  Sebastian Cammann; Kai Timrott; Ralf-Peter Vonberg; Florian W R Vondran; Harald Schrem; Sebastian Suerbaum; Jürgen Klempnauer; Hüseyin Bektas; Moritz Kleine
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Poor Results of Pancreatoduodenectomy in High-Risk Patients with Endoscopic Stent and Bile Colonization are Associated with E. coli, Diabetes and Advanced Age.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Matteo De Pastena; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giovanni Butturini; Vincenzo Violi; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Therapeutic options for the management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Maria L Rossi; Azeem A Rehman; Christopher S Gondi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.