Literature DB >> 23665744

Patient specific or routine preoperative workup in septoplasty: which one is cost-effective?

Haşmet Yazıcı1, Hayrettin Daşkaya, Sedat Doğan, İlknur Haberal, Taner Çiftçi.   

Abstract

This study aimed at determining the limits of preoperative investigation and calculate estimated cost analysis in septoplasty with and without turbinate surgery. A retrospective chart review. The study was conducted at secondary referral center. A retrospective chart review of patients who have undergone septoplasty over a 1-year period was performed. The need for routine (battery testing) versus patient specific preoperative workup of 380 septoplasty patients was evaluated. Mean age of the patients was 31.5 ± 4.6. The patients were classified into three groups according to preoperative routine laboratory testing results: (1) normal group (2) abnormal group and (3) abnormal out of action limit group. Medical records were revaluated by an anesthesiologist and ear nose throat doctor according to preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines to calculate estimated possible costs in case of patient specific preoperative workup. Three hundred seventy-seven patients were within ASA 1 group and three patients were within ASA 2. According to preoperative battery testing results, 5.8% of the patients (n = 22) were in group 1, 93.4% (n = 355) were in group 2, 0.8% (n = 3) were in group 3. Surgery was postponed due to concomitant pathologies for about 44 days (10-180 days) in four patients (1.1%). Preoperative routine laboratory testing costs were calculated as $41.08 ± 6.69 (40.25-128.78) per patient. When medical records were reevaluated retrospectively, estimated cost per patient would be $8.91 ± 10.40 (7.18-79.91) if patient specific preoperative workup were done. Individual preoperative testing would save $12,226.78 annually and total cost would decrease from $15,612.41 to $3,385.62. (p = 0.001). Patient-specific preoperative workup is more cost effective than routine battery testing in septoplasty with and without turbinate surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665744     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2541-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  10 in total

1.  More preoperative assessment by physicians and less by laboratory tests.

Authors:  M F Roizen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Unindicated preoperative testing: ASA physical status and financial implications.

Authors:  A W Vogt; L C Henson
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  O D Schein; J Katz; E B Bass; J M Tielsch; L H Lubomski; M A Feldman; B G Petty; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Preoperative testing: moving from individual testing to risk management.

Authors:  Lewis Reuven Pasternak
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Why do physicians order unnecessary preoperative tests? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Steven R Brown; Jaclyn Brown
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 7.  Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  J Munro; A Booth; J Nicholl
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Value of routine preoperative tests: a multicentre study in four general hospitals.

Authors:  A Perez; J Planell; C Bacardaz; A Hounie; J Franci; C Brotons; L Congost; I Bolibar
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening.

Authors:  E B Kaplan; L B Sheiner; A J Boeckmann; M F Roizen; S L Beal; S N Cohen; C D Nicoll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Role of routine laboratory investigations in preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  Aditya Kumar; Uma Srivastava
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.