Bernard Tawfik1, J B Collins1, Nora F Fino1, David P Miller1. 1. From the Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, the Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest Baptist Health Performance Improvement, and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sharing laboratory charge and personal utilization information with physicians can reduce laboratory test orders and expenditures, thereby decreasing the overutilization of laboratory testing. METHODS: This was a prospective study. By querying our electronic medical records, we calculated the median laboratory charges per patient/per day (PP/PD) and median laboratory tests ordered PP/PD for the resident general internal medicine and hospitalist services. For 10 weeks, we shared this team-based information with physicians with weekly updates. We calculated total laboratory charges for the 10 most common discharge diagnoses to capture laboratory charges for entire episodes of care. RESULTS: During the intervention, the mean number of laboratory tests ordered PP/PD by resident service decreased from 5.56 to 5.17 (-0.389, P <0.001); the mean charge PP/PD decreased from $488 to $461 (-$27, P < 0.001). The hospitalist service decreased the number of laboratory tests ordered PP/PD from 3.54 to 3.36 (-0.18, P = 0.77) and the mean charge PP/PD decreased from $331 to $301 (-$30, P = 0.96). The statistically significant decline in laboratory charges persisted after controlling for the 10 most common discharge diagnoses. Compared with the 3-month period before the study began, physicians in the 10-week intervention period ordered 1464 fewer laboratory tests, resulting in a $188,000 reduction in charges and a 3% to 4% reduction in utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Informing physicians of the charges for laboratory tests and their personal utilization patterns can reduce the number of laboratory tests ordered and laboratory expenditures, especially for physicians in training.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sharing laboratory charge and personal utilization information with physicians can reduce laboratory test orders and expenditures, thereby decreasing the overutilization of laboratory testing. METHODS: This was a prospective study. By querying our electronic medical records, we calculated the median laboratory charges per patient/per day (PP/PD) and median laboratory tests ordered PP/PD for the resident general internal medicine and hospitalist services. For 10 weeks, we shared this team-based information with physicians with weekly updates. We calculated total laboratory charges for the 10 most common discharge diagnoses to capture laboratory charges for entire episodes of care. RESULTS: During the intervention, the mean number of laboratory tests ordered PP/PD by resident service decreased from 5.56 to 5.17 (-0.389, P <0.001); the mean charge PP/PD decreased from $488 to $461 (-$27, P < 0.001). The hospitalist service decreased the number of laboratory tests ordered PP/PD from 3.54 to 3.36 (-0.18, P = 0.77) and the mean charge PP/PD decreased from $331 to $301 (-$30, P = 0.96). The statistically significant decline in laboratory charges persisted after controlling for the 10 most common discharge diagnoses. Compared with the 3-month period before the study began, physicians in the 10-week intervention period ordered 1464 fewer laboratory tests, resulting in a $188,000 reduction in charges and a 3% to 4% reduction in utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Informing physicians of the charges for laboratory tests and their personal utilization patterns can reduce the number of laboratory tests ordered and laboratory expenditures, especially for physicians in training.
Authors: Seunggu J Han; Rajiv Saigal; John D Rolston; Jason S Cheng; Catherine Y Lau; Rita I Mistry; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: C M Ashton; N J Petersen; J Souchek; T J Menke; H J Yu; K Pietz; M L Eigenbrodt; G Barbour; K W Kizer; N P Wray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-01-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Casey B Duncan; Kimberly M Brown; Yimei Han; Courtney M Townsend; Taylor S Riall Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Renuka S Bindraban; Maarten J Ten Berg; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Mark H H Kramer; Wouter W Van Solinge; Prabath W B Nanayakkara Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.464