Literature DB >> 9278546

Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning.

P N Sabes1, M I Jordan.   

Abstract

A novel obstacle avoidance paradigm was used to investigate the planning of human reaching movements. We explored whether the CNS plans arm movements based entirely on the visual space kinematics of the movements, or whether the planning process incorporates specific details of the biomechanical plant to optimize the trajectory plan. Participants reached around an obstacle, the tip of which remained fixed in space throughout the experiment. When the obstacle and the start and target locations were rotated about the tip of the obstacle, the visually specified task constraints retained a rotational symmetry. If movements are planned in visual space, as indicated from a variety of studies on planar point-to-point movements, the resulting trajectories should also be rotationally symmetric across trials. However, systematic variations in movement path were observed as the orientation of the obstacle was changed. These path asymmetries can be accounted for by a class of models in which the planner reduces the likelihood of collision with the obstacle by taking into account the anisotropic sensitivity of the arm to external perturbations or uncertainty in joint level control or proprioception. The model that best matches the experimental results uses planning criteria based on the inertial properties of the arm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9278546      PMCID: PMC6573278     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  23 in total

1.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements.

Authors:  T Kaminski; A M Gentile
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model.

Authors:  Y Uno; M Kawato; R Suzuki
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of human arm movements in two dimensions: paths and joint control in avoiding simple linear obstacles.

Authors:  J Dean; M Brüwer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Equilibrium-point control hypothesis examined by measured arm stiffness during multijoint movement.

Authors:  H Gomi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi; N Hogan; E Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  33 in total

1.  Curvature of visual space under vertical eye rotation: implications for spatial vision and visuomotor control.

Authors:  J D Crawford; D Y Henriques; T Vilis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interlimb differences of directional biases for stroke production.

Authors:  Wanyue Wang; Travis Johnson; Robert L Sainburg; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of vision, speed, and attention in overcoming directional biases during arm movements.

Authors:  Natalia Dounskaia; Jacob A Goble
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus.

Authors:  Christian Dohle; Klaus Martin Stephan; Jakob T Valvoda; Omid Hosseiny; Lutz Tellmann; Torsten Kuhlen; Rüdiger J Seitz; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differential exploitation of the inertia tensor in multi-joint arm reaching.

Authors:  Delphine Bernardin; Brice Isableu; Paul Fourcade; Benoît G Bardy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Movement planning with probabilistic target information.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Tian Shen; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication.

Authors:  Bernd J Kröger; Stefan Kopp; Anja Lowit
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-12-10

9.  The role of inertial sensitivity in motor planning.

Authors:  P N Sabes; M I Jordan; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  It's Not (Only) the Mean that Matters: Variability, Noise and Exploration in Skill Learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.