Literature DB >> 2742921

Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model.

Y Uno1, M Kawato, R Suzuki.   

Abstract

In this paper, we study trajectory planning and control in voluntary, human arm movements. When a hand is moved to a target, the central nervous system must select one specific trajectory among an infinite number of possible trajectories that lead to the target position. First, we discuss what criterion is adopted for trajectory determination. Several researchers measured the hand trajectories of skilled movements and found common invariant features. For example, when moving the hand between a pair of targets, subjects tended to generate roughly straight hand paths with bell-shaped speed profiles. On the basis of these observations and dynamic optimization theory, we propose a mathematical model which accounts for formation of hand trajectories. This model is formulated by defining an objective function, a measure of performance for any possible movement: square of the rate of change of torque integrated over the entire movement. That is, the objective function CT is defined as follows: (formula; see text) We overcome this difficult by developing an iterative scheme, with which the optimal trajectory and the associated motor command are simultaneously computed. To evaluate our model, human hand trajectories were experimentally measured under various behavioral situations. These results supported the idea that the human hand trajectory is planned and controlled in accordance with the minimum torque-change criterion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2742921     DOI: 10.1007/bf00204593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  19 in total

Review 1.  Computational vision and regularization theory.

Authors:  T Poggio; V Torre; C Koch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Sep 26-Oct 2       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Coordinates transformation and learning control for visually-guided voluntary movement with iteration: a Newton-like method in a function space.

Authors:  M Kawato; M Isobe; Y Maeda; R Suzuki
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 3.  Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation.

Authors:  D Bullock; S Grossberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.

Authors:  J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations.

Authors:  S C Cannon; G I Zahalak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human arm trajectory formation.

Authors:  W Abend; E Bizzi; P Morasso
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  233 in total

1.  Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superposition of principal components.

Authors:  T D Sanger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed.

Authors:  Charalambos Papaxanthis; Thierry Pozzo; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning.

Authors:  P N Sabes; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Modelling approaches in biomechanics.

Authors:  R McN Alexander
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Control of oral closure in lingual stop consonant production.

Authors:  Anders Löfqvist; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance.

Authors:  Jae K Shim; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad Paul Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.