Literature DB >> 16292573

Differential exploitation of the inertia tensor in multi-joint arm reaching.

Delphine Bernardin1, Brice Isableu, Paul Fourcade, Benoît G Bardy.   

Abstract

The identification of the kinaesthetic information used for directing 3D multi-joint arm movements toward a target remains an open question. Several psychophysical studies have suggested that the ability to perceive and control the spatial orientation of our limbs depends on the exploitation of the eigenvectors (e (3)) of the inertia tensor (I ( ij )), which correspond to the arm rotational inertial axes. The present experiment aimed at investigating whether e (3) was used as a collective variable to direct the masses toward the target and hence to control the spatial accuracy of the final hand position. Natural, unconstrained, three-dimensional multi-joint reaching movements were submitted to alterations of forearm mass distribution. Given the existence of several "sensorimotor strategies" for the control of arm movements, the participants were a priori contrasted and ranged in groups according to their reliance on either visual or kinaesthetic information. The results indicated (1) the dependency of the arm's directional control on I ( ij ) parameters, (2) a non-linear relationship between the performance predicted by the inertia tensor and the observed performance, depending on the deviation amplitude and (3) the presence of a large inter-individual variability suggesting the existence of different strategies, including proprioceptive compensation mechanisms. This study validates in unconstrained multi-joint arm movements the exploitation of the inertia tensor by the central nervous system, thus simplifying the coordination of the segments' masses during reaching. The results also provide evidence for the existence of motor alternatives in exploiting proprioceptive information that may depend on spatial referencing modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16292573     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0161-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  37 in total

1.  Inertial constraints on limb proprioception are independent of visual calibration.

Authors:  M A Riley; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Is there a preferred coordinate system for perception of hand orientation in three-dimensional space?

Authors:  W G Darling; L Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of the inertia tensor in kinesthesis.

Authors:  C C Pagano
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2000

5.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation.

Authors:  S V Adamovich; M B Berkinblit; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Théophile Ohlmann; Jacques Crémieux; Bernard Amblard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

1.  Differential integration of kinaesthetic signals to postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptive and phase transition behavior in performance of discrete multi-articular actions by degenerate neurobiological systems.

Authors:  Robert Rein; Keith Davids; Chris Button
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential integration of visual and kinaesthetic signals to upright stance.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Benoît Fourre; Nicolas Vuillerme; Guillaume Giraudet; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors.

Authors:  Rolf van de Langenberg; Idsart Kingma; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?

Authors:  Marc Gueguen; Nicolas Vuillerme; Brice Isableu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adaptive use of interaction torque during arm reaching movement from the optimal control viewpoint.

Authors:  Van Hoan Vu; Brice Isableu; Bastien Berret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.