Literature DB >> 9274410

Screening for amblyopia: a comparison of paediatric letter tests.

A J Simmers1, L S Gray, K Spowart.   

Abstract

AIMS/
BACKGROUND: The measurement of visual acuity is the most widely accepted indicator of amblyopia and is thought by some to be the only effective screening test. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the traditional single optotype Sheridan-Gardiner test (SGT) in the measurement of visual acuity and the detection of amblyopia, compared with the log based linear format Glasgow acuity cards (GAC).
METHODS: In the present study visual acuity was measured monocularly in 702 primary 1 schoolchildren using both acuity tests.
RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) visual acuity measured with GAC (0.9 (0.08) modified logMAR) and SGT (1.13 (0.09) modified logMAR), df = 632, t = -59.08, p = 0.0001. The majority of children (89.3%) achieved visual acuities better than 6/6 in either eye when using the single optotype test. If the 95% confidence limits for a significant interocular difference in acuity are used as-criteria for the detection of unilateral amblyopia, GAC were found to be the most sensitive, correctly identifying 100%, while SGT identified 55% of the children with unilateral amblyopia.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight several problems with both the test format and testing procedure in the present school screening system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9274410      PMCID: PMC1722216          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.81.6.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  21 in total

Review 1.  The management of squint.

Authors:  A R Fielder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.

Authors:  I L Bailey; M A Bullimore; T W Raasch; H R Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  A reassessment of infantile esotropia. XLIV Edward Jackson memorial lecture.

Authors:  G K von Noorden
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  J E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cambridge Crowding Cards at 3 and 6 m.

Authors:  J Atkinson; S Anker; C Evans; R Hall; E Pimm-Smith
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1988-10

6.  Multiple sensitive periods in the development of the primate visual system.

Authors:  R S Harwerth; E L Smith; G C Duncan; M L Crawford; G K von Noorden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The possibility of preventing amblyopia.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Stimulus and communication demands of visual acuity tests.

Authors:  S M Pickert; H Wachs
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-12

10.  Visual acuity of the preschool child: a review.

Authors:  K D Fern; R E Manny
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-05
View more
  21 in total

1.  A VEP investigation of parallel visual pathway development in primary school age children.

Authors:  G E Gordon; D L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Use of Lea symbols in young children.

Authors:  M X Repka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.

Authors:  D K Newman; M M East
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: can an optimal duration be identified?

Authors:  M Cleary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Should we be screening for and treating amblyopia?

Authors:  Gordon N Dutton; Marie Cleary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-29

6.  In the absence of strabismus what constitutes a visual deficit in children?

Authors:  S J Shea; L Gaccon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Normative pediatric visual acuity using single surrounded HOTV optotypes on the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester following the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol.

Authors:  James R Drover; Joost Felius; Christina S Cheng; Sarah E Morale; Lauren Wyatt; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Brief Report: Vision in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Should Clinicians Expect?

Authors:  Pamela M Anketell; Kathryn J Saunders; Stephen M Gallagher; Clare Bailey; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-09

9.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual acuity norms in pre-school children: the Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Ying Pan; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Susan A Cotter; Ge Wen; Mark S Borchert; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.