Literature DB >> 9273372

Early failure of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

G D Riebel1, F W Werner, D C Ayers, J Bromka, D G Murray.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has been proposed as treatment for unicompartmental arthritis. Overall, results have been satisfactory, with occasional failures of tibial component fixation. Short-term loosening of the femoral components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty that required revision to total knee arthroplasty is reported. All patients presented with pain and instability of the knee, with loosening confirmed radiographically and at revision surgery. The Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) was biomechanically tested after being implanted in cadaver limbs. Cyclic loading in flexion and extension under physiologic loads resulted in implant failure. The mode of failure was rocking in the sagittal plane, which corresponds to the clinical findings. The femoral implant design consists of an angled bone-implant interface with straight arms, which causes shear at the bone-prosthesis interface did not loosen under identical biomechanical testing in paired knees. It was concluded that the Porous-Coated Anatomic femoral component has an unacceptably high early clinical loosening rate, confirmed by comparative biomechanical testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9273372     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80205-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system.

Authors:  L Perlick; H Bäthis; M Tingart; C Perlick; C Lüring; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Does increased tibial slope reduce the wear rate of unicompartmental knee prostheses? An in vitro investigation].

Authors:  P Weber; C Schröder; S Utzschneider; F Schmidutz; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ricardo Postigo; Sowon Koo; Jong Hun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Analysis and Treatment of Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jae Il Lee; Jin Woo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.