Literature DB >> 22476420

[Does increased tibial slope reduce the wear rate of unicompartmental knee prostheses? An in vitro investigation].

P Weber1, C Schröder, S Utzschneider, F Schmidutz, V Jansson, P E Müller.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become a standard procedure with good clinical outcome in patients with isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee. However, the survival rates of UKA are still inferior compared to that of total knee arthroplasty. Aseptic loosening and wear are responsible for more than 50% of revisions. Therefore, this study evaluated the influence of the tibial slope on the wear rate in a medial UKA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The wear rate of a medial mobile-bearing UKA (Univation® Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Deutschland) was evaluated according to the ISO 14243-1:2002(E) norm with a customized four-station servo-hydraulic knee wear simulator (EndoLab, Thansau, Germany). In the first group, the prostheses was medially implanted with 0° slope (n = 3) and in the second group the prostheses was medially implanted with 8° slope (n = 3). The lateral side was kept constant with 0° in both groups. For each implant, a total of 5.0 million cycles was performed and after every 0.5 million cycles the gravimetric wear rate was determined.
RESULTS: The wear rate in the 0° slope group was 3.46 ± 0.59 mg/million cycles and therefore significantly higher than in the 8° slope group with 0.99 ± 0.42 mg/million cycles (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: An increase in the tibial slope leads to a reduced wear rate in a mobile-bearing UKA. Therefore, at least for this mobile-bearing UKA a higher tibial slope seems favorable to reduce the wear. However, before an optimal position of the tibial slope can be recommended, further investigations are required to evaluate the influence of the tibial slope on other factors, such as the ligament tension or the strain on the lateral compartment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476420     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1857-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  21 in total

1.  Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; Sandra Utzschneider; Christian Schröder; Jens Schwiesau; Bernhard Fritz; Allan Maas; Wilhelm Blömer; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Wear analysis of unicondylar mobile bearing and fixed bearing knee systems: a knee simulator study.

Authors:  J Philippe Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Reinders; Eva Lietz; Babak Moradi; Kerstin Hofmann; Robert Sonntag
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--the influence of tibial component inclination.

Authors:  T Sawatari; H Tsumura; K Iesaka; Y Furushiro; T Torisu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision.

Authors:  Thomas J Aleto; Michael E Berend; Merrill A Ritter; Philip M Faris; R Michael Meneghini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope.

Authors:  S Utzschneider; M Goettinger; P Weber; A Horng; C Glaser; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The wear of fixed and mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.

Authors:  C L Brockett; L M Jennings; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  Early failure of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G D Riebel; F W Werner; D C Ayers; J Bromka; D G Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A A Hofmann; K N Bachus; R W Wyatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Importance of tibial slope for stability of the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  J Robert Giffin; Kathryne J Stabile; Thore Zantop; Tracy M Vogrin; Savio L-Y Woo; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  Experimental testing of total knee replacements with UHMW-PE inserts: impact of severe wear test conditions.

Authors:  Carmen Zietz; Joern Reinders; Jens Schwiesau; Alexander Paulus; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Thomas Grupp; Sandra Utzschneider; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Can accuracy of component alignment be improved with Oxford UKA Microplasty® instrumentation?

Authors:  Jonathan Patrick Ng; Jason Chi Ho Fan; Lawrence Chun Man Lau; Tycus Tao Sun Tse; Samuel Yik Cheung Wan; Yuk Wah Hung
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.