Literature DB >> 9255432

Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

M Eimer1.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials and response latencies were measured in an experiment where centrally presented arrow cues were followed by left or right visual target stimuli. In one condition, target location was indicated by the cues with 75% validity. In another condition, the precues were uninformative with respect to target location. Faster response times and larger negativities in the ERPs at midline electrodes were measured for targets at cued locations following informative cues, but also with uninformative precues. This indicates that visual-spatial attention may be biased involuntarily by central symbolic precues.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9255432     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(97)05254-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  20 in total

1.  Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-10

2.  Pending intentions: effects of prospective task encoding on the performance of another task.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-04-26

Review 3.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Is there a direct link between gaze perception and joint attention behaviours? Effects of gaze contrast polarity on oculomotor behaviour.

Authors:  Paola Ricciardelli; Elena Betta; Sonia Pruner; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Fearful, surprised, happy, and angry facial expressions modulate gaze-oriented attention: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Amandine Lassalle; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Reflexive social attention is mapped according to effector-specific reference systems.

Authors:  Filippo Crostella; Filippo Carducci; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Shifts of attention bias awareness of voluntary and reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Maria M Robinson; David E Irwin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Disruption of the Right Temporoparietal Junction Impairs Probabilistic Belief Updating.

Authors:  Paola Mengotti; Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.