Literature DB >> 28473647

Disruption of the Right Temporoparietal Junction Impairs Probabilistic Belief Updating.

Paola Mengotti1, Pascasie L Dombert2, Gereon R Fink2,3, Simone Vossel2,4.   

Abstract

Generating and updating probabilistic models of the environment is a fundamental modus operandi of the human brain. Although crucial for various cognitive functions, the neural mechanisms of these inference processes remain to be elucidated. Here, we show the causal involvement of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) in updating probabilistic beliefs and we provide new insights into the chronometry of the process by combining online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with computational modeling of behavioral responses. Female and male participants performed a modified location-cueing paradigm, where false information about the percentage of cue validity (%CV) was provided in half of the experimental blocks to prompt updating of prior expectations. Online double-pulse TMS over rTPJ 300 ms (but not 50 ms) after target appearance selectively decreased participants' updating of false prior beliefs concerning %CV, reflected in a decreased learning rate of a Rescorla-Wagner model. Online TMS over rTPJ also impacted on participants' explicit beliefs, causing them to overestimate %CV. These results confirm the involvement of rTPJ in updating of probabilistic beliefs, thereby advancing our understanding of this area's function during cognitive processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Contemporary views propose that the brain maintains probabilistic models of the world to minimize surprise about sensory inputs. Here, we provide evidence that the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) is causally involved in this process. Because neuroimaging has suggested that rTPJ is implicated in divergent cognitive domains, the demonstration of an involvement in updating internal models provides a novel unifying explanation for these findings. We used computational modeling to characterize how participants change their beliefs after new observations. By interfering with rTPJ activity through online transcranial magnetic stimulation, we showed that participants were less able to update prior beliefs with TMS delivered at 300 ms after target onset.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/375419-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; cue validity; learning rate; probabilistic inference; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28473647      PMCID: PMC6596530          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3683-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Jonathan M Payne; Mark G Stokes; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Jérémie Mattout; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; John Ashburner; Will Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body.

Authors:  Manos Tsakiris; Marcello Costantini; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gaurav Patel; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Matthew F S Rushworth; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction.

Authors:  Olaf Blanke; Christine Mohr; Christoph M Michel; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter Brugger; Margitta Seeck; Theodor Landis; Gregor Thut
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind.

Authors:  Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impaired Right Temporoparietal Junction-Hippocampus Connectivity in Schizophrenia and Its Relevance for Generating Representations of Other Minds.

Authors:  Florian Bitsch; Philipp Berger; Arne Nagels; Irina Falkenberg; Benjamin Straube
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Subanaesthetic ketamine and altered states of consciousness in humans.

Authors:  P E Vlisides; T Bel-Bahar; A Nelson; K Chilton; E Smith; E Janke; V Tarnal; P Picton; R E Harris; G A Mashour
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Repetitive TMS of the temporo-parietal junction disrupts participant's expectations in a spontaneous Theory of Mind task.

Authors:  Lara Bardi; Pieter Six; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Simultaneous modeling of reaction times and brain dynamics in a spatial cueing task.

Authors:  Simon R Steinkamp; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel; Ralph Weidner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.