Literature DB >> 9242334

Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous free flap.

R K Khouri1, C Y Ahn, M A Salzhauer, D Scherff, W W Shaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the results and morbidity associated with simultaneous bilateral TRAM free flap breast reconstruction and describe refinements in its surgical technique. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Bilateral prophylactic total mastectomies might be an agreeable option for those patients at highest risk for breast cancer if autogenous tissue breast reconstruction could be performed with reasonable technical ease and acceptable morbidity. However, some surgeons harbor reservations regarding the extensiveness of the surgery, the associated morbidity, and the aesthetic quality of the resulting outcome.
METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review of clinical experience with 120 consecutive patients who underwent 240 simultaneous bilateral TRAM free flap breast reconstructions was developed.
RESULTS: The average operating time, including the time required for the breast ablative portion of the procedures, was 8.6 hours. The average length of hospitalization was 7.6 days. However, for the last 40 patients, these figures were reduced to 7.1 hours and 6.1 days, respectively. Nonautologous blood transfusions were needed in 33 cases (28%), but only 1 was required in the last 40 patients. Thromboses developed in six of 240 flaps (2.5%): 4 were arterial and 2 were venous. Re-exploration allowed us to restore circulation in five flaps, whereas one flap was unsalvageable and was replaced successfully with an alternate flap. An uncomplicated deep vein thromboses developed in one patient with a history of recurrent deep vein thromboses that had no adverse effect on her outcome. Minor complications developed in 18 patients (15%) (e.g., hematoma, partial wound necrosis, wound infection, or prolonged postoperative ileus) that did not affect the long-term outcome. Fourteen patients (11.6%) had abdominal wall weakness or hernias. Follow-up time averaged 37.2 months (range, 14-62 months). On last follow-up, patients' self-reported overall satisfaction with the procedure was 56% excellent, 40% good, and 4% fair.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous bilateral free flap reconstruction is technically feasible with a high rate of success and an acceptable morbidity. When performed by experienced surgeons, bilateral prophylactic total mastectomies combined with simultaneous bilateral TRAM free flap reconstruction may provide an adequate surgical option with aesthetically acceptable results for patients at high risk for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9242334      PMCID: PMC1190903          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199707000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S S Kroll; B Baldwin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Technical considerations for prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  W J Temple; R L Lindsay; E Magi; S J Urbanski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction: a review of 75 cases.

Authors:  M G Dickson; D T Sharpe
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1987-11

4.  Decision analysis--effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  D Schrag; K M Kuntz; J E Garber; J C Weeks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Bilateral free flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  W W Shaw
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 6.  Why I choose autogenous tissue in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J Bostwick; G Jones
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.017

7.  Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap?

Authors:  M A Schusterman; S S Kroll; M E Weldon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center's experience with 211 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M A Schusterman; S S Kroll; M J Miller; G P Reece; B J Baldwin; G L Robb; C S Altmyer; F C Ames; S E Singletary; M I Ross
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J C Grotting; M M Urist; W A Maddox; L O Vasconez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Z M Arnez; J Bajec; A F Bardsley; T Scamp; M H Webster
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

2.  Cryptogenic stroke following abdominal free flap breast reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Huizhuang Xie; Charles M Malata
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-11

3.  A single center prospective study of bilateral breast reconstruction with free abdominal flaps: a critical analyses of 144 patients.

Authors:  Christoph Andree; Stefan Langer; Katrin Seidenstuecker; Philipp Richrath; Philipp Behrendt; Tobias Koeppe; Mazen Hagouan; Christan Witzel; Samma Al Benna; Beatrix Munder
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.