Literature DB >> 2523544

Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction.

J C Grotting1, M M Urist, W A Maddox, L O Vasconez.   

Abstract

Immediate breast reconstruction using the transverse abdominal myocutaneous island (TRAM) flap was performed in 54 patients over the past 3 years at our institution. This represented approximately 59 percent of patients undergoing all types of immediate breast reconstruction. In 10 patients, the abdominal island flap was transferred as a free flap based on the deep inferior epigastric pedicle. These patients were compared with the other 44 patients, in whom the flap was transferred using the conventional technique. The TRAM flap is well suited for immediate breast reconstruction because the procedure can be carried out simultaneously with mastectomy using separate operating teams and instruments. The operation is safe and relatively free of complications. The free TRAM group compared favorably with the conventional group in terms of complications, operating time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, and return to functional baseline. The free TRAM flap appears to be as safe as the conventional technique with the advantages of a more limited rectus muscle harvest, improved medial contour of the breast due to the lack of tunneling, and perhaps a healthier flap because of the large donor vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2523544     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198905000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  31 in total

1.  Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

3.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Toni Zhong; Katie Weichman; Michael Papsdorf; Peter A Lennox; Alexes Hazen; Evan Matros; Joseph Disa; Babak Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 6.  Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Atsushi Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: a safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas.

Authors:  K B Clough; D Bourgeois; M C Falcou; C Renolleau; J C Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  T J Eberlein; L D Crespo; B L Smith; C A Hergrueter; L Douville; E Eriksson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  A survey of general surgeons' attitudes towards breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  G E Spyrou; O G Titley; J Cerqueiro; M F Fatah
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer.

Authors:  C M Balch; S E Singletary; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.