Literature DB >> 8192381

The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center's experience with 211 consecutive cases.

M A Schusterman1, S S Kroll, M J Miller, G P Reece, B J Baldwin, G L Robb, C S Altmyer, F C Ames, S E Singletary, M I Ross.   

Abstract

All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps from February 1989 to November 1992 were registered into a computerized database and followed prospectively. There were 211 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions in 163 patients; 48 reconstructions were bilateral. A muscle split technique was used in 108 of 211 reconstructions (51%). Total flap loss occurred in 3 of 211 reconstructions for a success rate of 99%. Complications occurred in 81 of 211 reconstructions (38%). Fat necrosis or partial flap loss occurred in 15 of 211 (7%). Hernia or bulge occurred in 11 patients (5%). The bulge/hernia rate tended to be lower in the muscle split group (4 of 108 [4%]) than in those who did not have muscle split procedures (7 of 103 [7%]), whereas the fat necrosis rate was slightly higher in the former group (9 of 108 [8%]) than in the latter (6 of 103 [6%]). Neither difference was statistically significant. However, patients who currently or previously smoked cigarettes did have a significantly higher incidence of fat necrosis: 12 of 99 smokers (12%) had fat necrosis compared with 3 of 112 nonsmokers (3%; p = 0.02).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8192381     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199403000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  14 in total

1.  Trends in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  [The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. A "second defensive line" in microvascular reconstructions of defects in the head and neck area].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; I Arapakis; W Maier; R Horch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Chest wall reconstruction and advanced disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth K Beahm; David W Chang
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Breast reconstruction at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  Peirong Yu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-08

6.  Simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous free flap.

Authors:  R K Khouri; C Y Ahn; M A Salzhauer; D Scherff; W W Shaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

8.  Immediate breast reconstruction by prosthesis: a safe technique for extensive intraductal and microinvasive carcinomas.

Authors:  K B Clough; D Bourgeois; M C Falcou; C Renolleau; J C Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  S E Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  [Breast reconstruction for patients with breast carcinoma : an analysis based on the data of 4,335 patients from 16 hospitals].

Authors:  M V Meyer-Marcotty; J Hankiss; M Flügel; J Redeker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 0.920

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.