Literature DB >> 9242285

Binocular spatial phase tuning characteristics of neurons in the macaque striate cortex.

E L Smith1, Y M Chino, J Ni, W H Ridder, M L Crawford.   

Abstract

We employed microelectrode recording techniques to study the sensitivity of individual neurons in the striate cortex of anesthetized and paralyzed monkeys to relative interocular image disparities and to determine the effects of basic stimulus parameters on these cortical binocular interactions. The visual stimuli were drifting sine wave gratings. After the optimal stimulus orientation, spatial frequency, and direction of stimulus movement were found, the cells' disparity tuning characteristics were determined by measuring responses as a function of the relative interocular spatial phase of dichoptic grating pairs. No attempts were made to assess absolute position disparities or horizontal disparities relative to the horopter. The majority (approximately 70%) of simple cells were highly sensitive to interocular spatial phase disparities, particularly neurons with balanced ocular dominances. Simple cells typically demonstrated binocular facilitation at the optimal phase disparity and binocular suppression for disparities 180 degrees away. Fewer complex cells were phase selective (approximately 40%); however, the range of disparity selectivity in phase-sensitive complex cells was comparable with that for simple cells. Binocular interactions in non-phase-sensitive complex cells were evidenced by binocular response amplitudes that differed from responses to monocular stimulation. The degree of disparity tuning was independent of a cell's optimal orientation or the degree of direction tuning. However, disparity-sensitive cells tended to have narrow orientation tuning functions and the degree of disparity tuning was greatest for the optimal stimulus orientations. Rotating the stimulus for one eye 90 degrees from the optimal orientation usually eliminated binocular interactions. The effects of phase disparities on the binocular response amplitude were also greatest at the optimal spatial frequency. Thus a cell's sensitivity to absolute position disparities reflects its spatial tuning characteristics, with cells sensitive to high spatial frequencies being capable of signaling very small changes in image disparity. On the other hand, stimulus contrast had relatively little effect on a cell's disparity tuning, because response saturation occurred at the same contrast level for all relative interocular phase disparities. Thus, as with orientation tuning, a cell's optimal disparity and the degree of disparity selectivity were invariant with contrast. Overall, the results show that sensitivity to interocular spatial phase disparities is a common property of striate neurons. A cell's disparity tuning characteristics appear to largely reflect its monocular receptive field properties and the interocular balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, distinct functional classes of cortical neurons could not be discriminated on the basis of disparity sensitivity alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9242285     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.1.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments.

Authors:  S J Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the Macaque.

Authors:  B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Binocular integration of pattern motion signals by MT neurons and by human observers.

Authors:  Chris Tailby; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rapid plasticity of binocular connections in developing monkey visual cortex (V1).

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Hua Bi; Eiichi Sakai; Ichiro Maruko; Jianghe Zheng; Earl L Smith; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptation to natural binocular disparities in primate V1 explained by a generalized energy model.

Authors:  Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Effects of brief daily periods of unrestricted vision during early monocular form deprivation on development of visual area 2.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Xiaofeng Tao; Janice M Wensveen; Ronald S Harwerth; Earl L Smith; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Postnatal development of binocular disparity sensitivity in neurons of the primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Y M Chino; E L Smith; S Hatta; H Cheng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.