Literature DB >> 12867533

Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Jenny C A Read1, Bruce G Cumming.   

Abstract

Disparity-selective neurons in striate cortex (V1) probably implement the initial processing that supports binocular vision. Recently, much progress has been made in understanding the computations that these neurons perform on retinal inputs. The binocular energy model has been highly successful in providing a simple theory of these computations. A key feature of the energy model is that it is linear until after inputs from the two eyes are combined. Recently, however, a modified version of the energy model, incorporating threshold nonlinearities before binocular combination, has been proposed to account for the weaker disparity tuning observed with anticorrelated stimuli. In this study, we present new data needed for a critical assessment of these two models. We compare two key predictions of the models with responses of disparity-selective neurons recorded from V1 of awake fixating monkeys. We find that the original energy model, and a family of generalizations retaining linear binocular combination, are quantitatively inconsistent with the response of V1 neurons. In contrast, the modified version incorporating threshold nonlinearities can explain both sets of observations. We conclude that the energy model can be reconciled with experimental observations by adding a threshold before binocular combination. This gives us the clearest picture yet of the computation being carried out by disparity-selective V1 neurons.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12867533      PMCID: PMC1472662          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01110.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  S J D Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Interocular mismatch in spatial frequency and directionality characteristics of striate cortical neurones.

Authors:  P Hammond; C J Pomfrett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; G C DeAngelis; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  R L De Valois; D G Albrecht; L G Thorell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  34 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective v1 neurons: relationship to stereoacuity and the pulfrich effect.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Short-latency disparity vergence eye movements: a response to disparity energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  The initial torsional Ocular Following Response (tOFR) in humans: a response to the total motion energy in the stimulus?

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.