Literature DB >> 10844045

Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the Macaque.

B G Cumming1, A J Parker.   

Abstract

Binocular neurons that are closely related to depth perception should respond selectively for stimuli eliciting an appropriate depth sensation. To separate perceived depth from local disparity within the receptive field, sinusoidal luminance gratings were presented within a circular aperture. The disparity of the aperture was coupled to that of the grating, thereby rendering unambiguous the psychophysical matching between repeating cycles of the grating. In cases in which the stimulus disparity differs by one horizontal period of the grating, the portion of the grating that locally covers a receptive field is binocularly identical, but the depth sensation is very different because of the aperture. For 117 disparity-selective V1 neurons tested in two monkeys, the overwhelming majority responded equally well to configurations that were locally identical but led to different perceptions of depth. Because the psychophysical sensation is not reflected in the firing rate of V1 neurons, the signals that make stereo matches explicit are most likely elaborated in extrastriate cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10844045      PMCID: PMC6772469     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

1.  Stereo correspondence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli.

Authors:  S J Prince; R A Eagle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments.

Authors:  S J Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat.

Authors:  C D Gilbert; T N Wiesel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model.

Authors:  I Ohzawa
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Planarity and segmentation in stereoscopic matching.

Authors:  G Mitchison
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  G F Poggio; B C Motter; S Squatrito; Y Trotter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; I D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  40 in total

1.  Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations.

Authors:  J S Bakin; K Nakayama; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences.

Authors:  H Bridge; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Hierarchical processing of horizontal disparity information in the visual forebrain of behaving owls.

Authors:  A Nieder; H Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Pre-attentive segmentation and correspondence in stereo.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream.

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  At what stage of neural processing do perspective depth cues make a difference?

Authors:  Alexandra Séverac Cauquil; Yves Trotter; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.